.
I will address specifically Bin Landen's Al Queda, and theocratic extremist.... This story does involve Iraq.
Once upon a time........
*The US was fighting in the cold war with Russia.
*We financed and armed Afgan rebels to repell the Russians.
**Bin Laden in the conflict in Afganistan becomes a CIA assest.
**Bin Landen surives a granade attack, and believes that his God had saved him. He becomes hardcore fundamentilist.
**Through Islam he see the west as infidels who want to conquer the Muslim world for oil, ect ect ect...
**FAST foward to BUSH 1, G. Herbert Bush...and Regan, we support Sadam against the regime in Iran.
**We give Sadam WMD's, gasses you name it to use against Iran.
**Meanwhile we are also arming Iran in order to support the Contras war in El Salvador..hence "Iran Contra"
** Iraq and Sadam are screwed over by russia financially, so they want to take over Kwait which they claim is theirs and which they claim is slant drilling.
********************** Sadam sends an embassador to the US to OK his actions of invading kwuait...because the US was thier Ally.
**Sadam invades, the united states convinces Sudia Arabia with doctored photos Iraq troop build up on the Sudi border.
** The US builds the Bin Sultan Air Base in Sudia Aribia.
**US leaves Iraq in oder to not create a Islamic State like Iran.
***Bin Laden see the Bin Sultan Air Base as part of the west's attack on mulism culture and will not have the US on Muslim holy land.
He turns for CIA asset to US enemy
***project for a new american century writes papers and stratiegies to invade the Middle East in order to secure oil.
**WTC is hit the first time early in Clintons presidency....
we capture the people involved and convict.
***While Bush is govener, Tali Ban Represntetives come to Texas, most likely to discuss the planned pipeline through their country.
*******Before leaving office the Clinton white house reports that the greatest threat facing the new century is Terrorism.
**Bush 2 takes office, Representative go to Afganistan again offer "carpet of gold or carpet of bombs." in order to build pipeline for gas and oil intrest.
**Afgansitan cuts production of herion, in order to cause price inflation.
*** the US gives Afganistan millions of dollars as a reward for cutting thier herion trade, some view as a bribe
**Bush vacations on his ranch and never meets with Counter Terriosm expert...ever.
**PDB, Bin Laden determined to attack...
** Our country is attacked. It is worst attack since pearl habor.
** The US prepares for the Afganistan and Iraq.
**Conflicts between CIA and DOD leave the CIA with no troop support.
**Bin Laden escapes Tora Bora
** DOD takes over intellegence...for Iraq invasion
** Pressures CIA to find any, connection.
** DOD produces information which the CIA disputes.
**DOD relys on Greman source Curveball, as sole source for Powell speach to UN.
**Curveball was said to be a drunk and a fraud by German intellegence.
**War in Iraq
** Al Queda tries to start a civil war to, zarquari wanting to literally kill all the shieite
**The Sunni and shieite start a civil war for power.
**Bathist, Sadam Loyalist begin guriella warfare
**Torture fotos are released from Guantanimo bay...add fuel to Fundemantalist Muslim hate.
** We create a traing ground, create an enviroment of civil war, and create a sense of Western colonization in the Muslim World.
we closed the Bin Sultan airbase in the end.
*
*
2006-06-24 06:17:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by nefariousx 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
As usual many Americans are blinded to the truth, they put their "patriotism" before their humanity.
It's ironic when so many people support a system of government, that couldn't care less about them, and that only represents the rich elites.
You would have thought that the policy by successive American governments to erode the peoples civil rights,slave labor,and no free health care or pensions would have stirred the American Public. But no, they just carry on repeating the propaganda they are subjected to.
I think we will soon see lots of America starving to death, in order to keep the Rich in the style they are accustomed to, maybe then the people Will rise up, and there will be a better deal for Americans, and the rest of the world
2006-06-24 14:21:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are a wealthy person you attract attention of all others who are not so fortunate and they would be waiting for an opportunity to attack you. loot you and your properties and without any regrets.This is natural human tendency and jealousy. So people qwould be waiting for an excuse or opportunity to usurp you as if amassing wealth even by legal means is a crime and as if others have a right to get a share of it as if it is a looted property.
You have seen many world leaders have been killed eliminated by some conspiracy and the truth had not come out though some scape goats were hanged or punished.
So long as some fighting is carried on outside ones soil the effect is not directly felt or seen or realised but when it takes place rightunder your nose we start to feel its pinch.
So there is no cause and effect relationship and if you relate it to any such reason you can add go on adding.
2006-06-24 13:24:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by THATHA75 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Churchill’s rantings are full of leftist hyperbole, vicious Nazi allusions, and calls for violence against the United States (“more 9/11s are necessary”) and an end to America itself (“There’s no U.S. in America anymore”). Should Churchill have been such a vicious court jester of the Right and slurred gays and minorities as he did the victims of mass murder, he would have been fired from his professor position long ago.
Ward Churchill proclaimed that he is a Native American of various tribal affiliations; he is not. Even his ridiculous costumes, occasional threats, and puerile rants cannot disguise that fact.
He seems to be a pop artist of sorts, but his canvasses are not quite his own either. Those of like political mind have praised his scholarship, but much of what he writes seems derivative, or misrepresents or outright plagiarizes others.
Churchill has spoken of the firsthand trauma of battle service as a combat veteran, both as a paratrooper and as a sniper — among the most hazardous of corps in the United States military. Once again, there is no such evidence that he served in any capacity other than what his official duties in a motor pool and as a projectionist entailed.
Churchill called those who died when the Twin Towers collapsed "little Eichmanns" (in reference to the architect of Nazi genocide). He later explained that he was referring to the brokers and traders who were crushed under tons of rubble, not the janitors and children burnt to a crisp.
The former, you see, were part of a "technocratic corps at the very heart of America’s global financial empire" – and, as such, the moral equivalent of the guards who gassed Jews at Auschwitz, Churchill asserted.
Nor were those who flew the planes into the World Trade Center terrorists but "desperate" men whose "gallant sacrifices" reflected "the courage of their convictions" – the courage to turn defenseless men, women and children into mounds of charred flesh.
Imagine, for a moment, that the professor wrote an essay in which he observed: "We should have used nuclear weapons on Iraq. Muslims are a blight on the planet. The fewer of them, the better."
In such a case, there would be no resolutions, no investigations, no please to let-every-voice-be-heard. Instead, Churchill would have been summarily dismissed – after he was flogged, keelhauled, and tarred-and-feathered.
To call the ravings of this tenured professor (annual salary, $96,000, courtesy of Colorado taxpayers) demented, is simplistic.
Evil isn’t a mental illness.
2006-06-24 13:17:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Shep 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I remember 9/11: I think every person in the country "dared" to ask, and did ask, "Why Have We Been Attacked": The answer is that some islamofascists are filled with rage at the ideas that America represents, and they want to kill Americans to show their displeasure with such things as "freedom". They very freedoms that allow a crackpot like Churchill to have a public forum.
2006-06-27 12:40:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by smoot 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ward Churchill is a nutbag who lied about his qualifications to get his teaching job.
We have been attacked because extremist Muslims believe that all non-Muslims should die. Focusing just on matters outside this country, the U.S. has never attacked defenseless people. In Iraq, the U.S. military is fighting terrorists armed with rocket-propelled grenades, roadside bombs, and machine guns. The terrorists, on the other hand, are indiscriminately killing innocent women and children with suicide bombers and roadside bombs. So you are completely, totally, 100% wrong.
2006-06-24 13:15:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Farly the Seer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is Ward Churchill the traitor who thought that the people killed in the WTC deserved it? I notice he's still living in this country and getting paid off the public dole. Why don't you and he and the rest of you leave and find another country. I'd suggest North Korea. They'll love you there.
2006-06-24 13:13:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by williegod 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The U.S. is trying to help the Iraqi people. If you saw some of the 'never letting people see' footage of when Hussein was first taken from power and his sons were killed, you would have seen happy Iraqis. However, the only thing that makes news is hate, murder, killings, and death. Happy people don't make good news. Try not to be brainwashed so easily.
2006-06-24 13:11:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by merlin_steele 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If we as a nation are so guilty and you are so enlightned, why don't you go to the Middle East and offer yourself up to them to expiate your crimes.
Yeah right, you'll stay here where it's safe and snipe your country from the inside, knowing that we even protect ungrateful little shits like you.
Warc Churchill has been discredited as a plagiarist by his own liberal university.
2006-06-24 13:31:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by ut78759 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
We were attacked because Bin Laden was mad that we had bases in Saudi Arabia and were supporting the House of Saud. He wanted the bases and our military out of the holy land and the price of oil to be $200 a barrel. And guess what....the bases are now gone and the price of oil is rising. He attacked us(with warnings) and got what he wanted. Wouldn't of be better to of removed the bases before so many lifes were lost?
2006-06-24 13:24:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by ggarsk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We deserved it and so did those Jews Hitler was getting rid of.
Now that i think of it, so did the 10's of millions of people Mao had slaughtered and the 20 million soviets Stalin butchered.
Hey for once I think the simple minded liberal has a point. We get attacked for 20 years by Muslim scum bags and finally retaliate. In your ultra biased, inane, fairly tale version of the world we are just like the hordes of dictators who have slaughtered millions of opposition in there own country.
GREAT POINT!!!!!!!!!!
2006-06-24 13:13:45
·
answer #11
·
answered by never_touched_her 2
·
0⤊
0⤋