English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-24 05:46:01 · 20 answers · asked by Gracier 1 in Education & Reference Homework Help

I want the reasons clearly.It is for the debate in my class.It is related to History.

2006-06-24 23:01:44 · update #1

20 answers

You must be patient. Folks like Iran and N. Korea are still in the planning and preparation stage, not to mention a few south american countries that don't hold a very high regard for us either. For now though President Bush is working as diligently as he knows how to alienate potential allies in the next war and insure that if one does break out, we'll go it alone.

2006-06-24 05:52:15 · answer #1 · answered by nothing 6 · 0 0

We have the United Nations for that purpose. Established immediately after the end of World War II, it helps resolve conflicts of all kinds throughout the world through peace treaties and diplomatic mediation. Its predecessor, the League of Nations, was established after the end of the Great War (World War I) and didn't prevent the outbreak of the Second World War. It was then deemed a failure. With the UN on the job, a third world war _is_ absolutely not needed. And that's the truth!

2006-06-24 14:58:34 · answer #2 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 0 0

Because there are International Organizations existing, like the United Nations, which have conciliatory role and they try to solve the differences of 2 or more countries through diplomacy. Nowadays, war is supposed to be the last solution (although I strongly believe that many organizations don't make too much effort to help solving a problem peacefully...).

2006-06-24 15:25:19 · answer #3 · answered by inatuk 4 · 0 0

Why are you so much eager for that? I think there's a big hand of yours in beginning of the third world war!!! And this plan of yours failed, so you are in a great tension, and asking everyone for the reason of that.

2006-06-25 03:33:25 · answer #4 · answered by Bluffmaster 3 · 0 0

MAD. Mutually Assured Destruction. One country uses one A bomb and another country uses one in retalliation. Then Country no. 1 uses two , then two uses three until we use so many bombs that we irradiate the planet so much no human can live here. Mutually Assured Destructuion. MAD.

2006-07-03 15:48:39 · answer #5 · answered by bulldog5667 3 · 0 0

The WWIII will be based on following things -
1. petrol
2. water
3. air

no doubt but it will take time .. hope this will not happen .. or else , everything will change ..

2006-06-24 14:15:48 · answer #6 · answered by boolean_z 3 · 0 0

The United Nations was formed to prevent it

2006-06-24 12:49:38 · answer #7 · answered by Discipulo legis, quis cogitat? 6 · 0 0

It is possible that there could be a third WW.

The way other nations are trying to build their own nukes, I hope the U.S. still has a bunch of her's left.

2006-06-24 21:19:50 · answer #8 · answered by bajaexplorer 2 · 0 0

the war on terror will beocme the third world war when N. Korea shoots, in my opinion we are in within 20 years of the third world war

2006-06-24 14:06:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

why do you want it to occur
there is UN to maintain peace but bush wont listen...
5% chances of occuring
it should not
it'll add another chapter in my future child's history book(that would be another 10 yrs from now)

2006-06-24 12:50:28 · answer #10 · answered by thegirlgenius 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers