Please, get off this site, i don't care what your bias is.
2006-06-24 01:46:26 · 13 answers · asked by chicagoan86 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Agree with you, no offense to other people, but there are many too long questions and additional details too, for chat there are mores spaces. Thank you
2006-06-24 01:51:16 · answer #1 · answered by pelancha 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
To have freedom of speech we all have to put up with things we don't like. Personally I think its worth it.
Just ignore the questions you don't like. Besides, many questions appear stupid that are not.
As a teacher, I always encourage my students to ask whatever questions they want. I don't want anybody to fear asking a 'stupid' question. Its a cliche but it has a lot of truth: 'There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers.'
And before I leave you to ponder the validity of your own question here's one of my favorite songs:
Brain Damage
The lunatic is on the grass
The lunatic is on the grass
Remebering games and daisy chains and laughs
Got to keep the loonies on the path
The lunatic is in the hall
The lunatics are in my hall
The paper holds their folded faces to the floor
And every day the paper boy brings more
And if the dam breaks open many years too soon
And if there is no room upon the hill
And if your head expodes with dark forbodings too
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon
The lunatic is in my head
The lunatic is in my head
You raise the blade, you make the change
You rearrange me 'till I'm sane
You lock the door
And throw away the key
There's someone in my head but its not me
And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear
You shout and no one seems to hear
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon
2006-06-24 02:07:43 · answer #2 · answered by megalomaniac 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
stay out of a factor you have not got faith in.??? Gosh, i've got faith interior the section. I do merely no longer "have faith in" the rest. you may locate that inflammatory, it potential that theory is the popularity of an concept which you won't be in a position to coach. That places it interior the area of fable. there are various substances for information that cotradicts religeon per se, and considered one of them isthe Nag Hammadi Library. those are scrolls buried by potential of the clergymen who knew that they have got been the words of the persons who knew Jesus in my view and needed to maintain his notice. The Romans have been burning each little thing they might locate on an identical time as they wrote the Bible at Nicea. Constantine feared Jesus and what he taught and he's the only in who advance into in cost of writing the Bible. no longer purely the hot testomony, yet he revised the previous testomony besides. Jesus denied being "The Kristos" (The Christ) in his existence time, yet advance into named Christ two decades after his death by potential of Paul. Paul advance right into a wannabe Pharisee who could no longer make the psychological cut back and dropped out of school and made up his very own religeon. Christianity. Jesus spok against the business enterprise of a church because of the fact he pronounced it would interfere with the direct expertise of the holy spirit. Jesus advance right into a Gnostic, and felt that church homes and clergymen might corrupt the gnosis of the great spirit. it rather is no longer a rant, i'm a Bible pupil, and regrettably, i comprehend lots greater with regard to the concern than lots of the "honest".
2016-10-31 09:48:48 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. I'm tired of it on both sides. If all they want to do is post crap about "Libtards" and "NeoConvicts" they should just go to a chat room and insult each other. It's getting really old. And worse now that school is out for the summer.
2006-06-24 01:53:41 · answer #4 · answered by meathead76 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's spelled lunatics Einstein, if you don't like it leave. We still have freedom of speech, right?, or is that something Bush and the neocon imbeciles are trying to eliminate as well?
2006-06-24 01:54:46 · answer #5 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What fun would that be? If Yahoo had a good Forum I wouldn't even be here.
2006-06-24 01:54:41 · answer #6 · answered by Richtree 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that I am weary, but they have the right to be here. I just ignore their questions. If we don't feed the fire, it will burn out.
2006-06-24 02:23:06 · answer #7 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds as if you are biased against lunatics.
2006-06-24 01:50:41 · answer #8 · answered by sam21462 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree chicagoan86, get off this site
2006-06-24 06:24:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmmm speaking of raving lunatics...
2006-06-24 02:16:31 · answer #10 · answered by absynthian 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋