a moderator would sort things out moderately, but an ultimator would do it ultimately.
2006-06-24 01:08:57 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
Hey hey hey! I'm impressed! Yes.
2006-06-24 01:10:44 · answer #1 · answered by Kango Man 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Personally I'd choose a moderator .... all things in moderation, you know. With a moderator people are more likely to accept a decision, but with an ultimator people may feel backed into a corner.
2006-06-24 02:06:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think there are cases where an ultimator would be better than a moderator. Isn't using an ultimator the same thing as binding arbitration? If so, I think you've come up with a cool job title for a not-so-glamorous job.
2006-06-24 01:15:03 · answer #3 · answered by ralph.cramdon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Ultimator of the Kirk of Scotland? Hmmm.
2006-06-24 10:52:23 · answer #4 · answered by unclefrunk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry to rain on your parade, but I think that "The Ultimator" sounds like a RAW wrestler or one of Schwarzenegger's new movies. Although I have to say it is pretty ingenious maybe your in the wrong business, next move.....Hollywood...... but, ultimately you have to make the desision after all, maybe you'll need to hire an ultimator to do that for you!!!!!!
2006-06-24 01:25:22 · answer #5 · answered by caperpuma 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ultimately doesn't seem often enough for me. Could we have an interminibator?
2006-06-24 01:24:23 · answer #6 · answered by Owlwings 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think a masterator might be better, someone who is a master at ultimating :P
2006-06-24 06:32:21 · answer #7 · answered by Mummy of 2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go get Married...U will then agree that a moderator is better..
2006-06-24 01:12:10 · answer #8 · answered by ashlypradhan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋