English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

In theory, yes. You create a new element each time you add one more proton to the previous one.

In practice, there seems to be a practical limit to the stability of the artificial elements that requires exponentially increasing amounts of energy to create the heavier artificial elements. And since these new elements are usually only stable for tiny fractions of a second, we can't hold them in place for long enough to pump another proton in.

Instead, what physicists do is take larger stable atoms and smash them together, and then look for signs of new elements based on their expected decay particles.

2006-06-24 01:17:49 · answer #1 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 0 1

Protons and neutrons, yeah, but the created elements will become increasingly unstable as the size increases.

2006-06-24 00:43:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. You would need many "full boat" of elements. Those being neutrons and electrons ( positive and neutral) along with the protons you would be supplying

2006-06-24 00:49:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It depends on whether :

-they are stable or not (which influence on how long they exist when you just crested them) some artifically created elements like Uum exists like a few miliseconds.

-the energy costs of putting another proton to the nucleus.

2006-06-24 01:27:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No.

Very large nuclei are fundamentally unstable.

The largest stable nucleus is that of uranium. This means that uranium is the largest naturally occuring element.

2006-06-24 02:29:04 · answer #5 · answered by Epidavros 4 · 0 0

For every proton there's an anti proton---

2006-06-24 07:20:58 · answer #6 · answered by Balthor 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers