Because they lie about easy to verify stuff, and don't seem to care?
Yeah, I think that's a good enough reason to hate them.
2006-07-03 07:31:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by arcayne_1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You've got to be kidding.
Let's forget about Bush for now. Ann Coulter does not speak the truth. She spews vitriol into books and people lap it up. Look at her recent comments about the 9/11 widows. That's not based on anything other than they disagree with her and her guy in office.
Ann Coulter is the very picture of a partisan hack pundit. She has no credibility. She convinces nobody. She's the Howard Stern of the Sunday morning shows.
2006-06-23 20:35:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dave R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't hate Ann Coulter because of her opinions, i think everyone has the right their own opinion. But i just think in Ann Coulter was in a different position...or is she walked in the shoes of a more disadvantaged person living in America, her views would be extremely different. As far as George Bush goes...lol what rock have you been living under...there are plenty of reasons....but its gotten to the point where i really don't care anymore...George Bush has gotten to the point where, its like your parents keep telling you to do something,and you just say "uh huh" and tune them out.
2006-06-23 20:39:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by krosstown221 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even Bill O' Reilly doesn't like Ann Coulter...
that speaks volumes.
also
Basscatcher, you're an imbecil, to say the least
" The USA is the most powerful, both economically and militarily, country on a planet with over 6 billion people on it. Does that make him the smartest guy on the planet? Probably not. Does it make him smarter than you? Without a doubt.
But let's continue. Shall we?
While you might consider him stupid, he was apparently smarter than the 100 million or so democrats who tried to defeat him in his last 8 elections. Plus, he received higher grades in college than the latest 2 liberal candidates threw up against him. "
First of all, Bush had absolutely nothing to do with the "USA is the most powerful, both economically and militarily, country on a planet with over 6 billion people on it."
It was like that before him, actually he made it poorer than it was before he took office. Nice try though.
Just because you defeat someone in office does not make you smarter than them you idiot. If it was this way, we would have nuclear scientists as presidents you fool. The only thing presidents are good at is bullshitting, and frankly, Dubya sucks at that too.
Also Bush got straight C's at Yale with help from his professors, which means, he got worse than C's, but the professors had to pass him because he is Daddy's boy. Also, Bill Gates dropped out of college, does that make him an idiot. Go back to fishing, because you have no place on yahoo answers with that reptilian brain of yours you idiot.
2006-06-23 22:07:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by gggg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Studdenfadden would be an idiot. Ann Coulter is a publicity hound and will say or do anything to keep the spotlight on her. And George Bush is just a moron.
2006-06-23 20:42:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by St. Jimmy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I Don't hate either one, your right they do speak the truth! but here is a way to get back at the morons that call President Bush stupid: Well now, lets see if we can put a few things in perspective for those among us who are the truly imbecilic, moronic, ignoramuses who think GWB is stupid.
Shall we compare what a stupid guy has done to what any of you have done - don't worry this will take about a second.
Here is a guy who, out of of 300 million people, has been selected twice to lead the country and who serves in the most powerful position of anyone in the country.
The USA is the most powerful, both economically and militarily, country on a planet with over 6 billion people on it. Does that make him the smartest guy on the planet? Probably not. Does it make him smarter than you? Without a doubt.
But let's continue. Shall we?
While you might consider him stupid, he was apparently smarter than the 100 million or so democrats who tried to defeat him in his last 8 elections. Plus, he received higher grades in college than the latest 2 liberal candidates threw up against him.
So, if according to you he is stupid, how has he also accomplished all of these things against people who you must consider smarter than you or why would you vote for them?
I would challenge you to take a look at your own pathetic, monumentally insignificant and truly worthless life and tell us all what you have accomplished in a way of even the most remote comparison.
The purpose of the question is to find exactly where YOU must inevitably rank on the intellectual scale in comparison since you have virtually nothing, either in your past or future, which will come close to a single one of gwb's accomplishments?
Looking at it that way, if you consider him stupid and he has accomplished all of these things, it must kind of make you feel about as insignificant and worthless as a drop of water in the worlds oceans. Or, to put it in terms you can relate to, a piece of cow sh*t in the middle of a 100,000 acre pasture.
Got It?
2006-06-23 20:39:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by basscatcher 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as there have been presidents, the American people have found it easier to blame their own problems on the president than to get busy taking care of them.
And as long as there have been elections, the losing side has declared them "fixed."
As long as there have been debates, especially on a national scale, the losing side has cried foul.
It's not accurate to say that "everyone" hates George Bush. A good many people in the US still support him, including me. That's not to say that he's perfect (far from it), but I feel that he's done a far, far better job than he's been given credit for.
I understand that people can have varying opinions, especially when it comes to painful topics like war. No problem there. But all I've heard in the opinions against President Bush have been arguments that hardly make sense, at least to me. Remember that everyone has an opinion, but very, very few people are actually qualified to critique national policy decisions. You can say you don't like the president, but don't take everything everyone says to heart.
As far as Ann Coutler, I couldn't say. I'm not even sure who she is. However, I'd bet it's also fair to say that not "everyone" hates her.
2006-07-06 03:23:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Think First 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude, let me give you some advice. A bush is a bush. Treat it right, and it will make you happy. Anyone posting here who is unhappy with your question, is a bush hater. That means they live in California. But it might fall into the the ocean soon, upon which 85% of Americas' problems will end. Have a nice night, and treat your bush right.
2006-06-23 20:53:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by phwar68 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ann only quotes other people's opinions in his books. He is not telling the truth because he doesn't even have his own opinion. Bush is just a puppet. He only tells the public what he is told too.
2006-06-27 05:21:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by drdoom0130 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
EVERYBODY is just too many. Many of us DO NOT HATE anyone, the word HATE implies many things. Hate is a NONO. One can dislike the poilicies of someone or their view points but no on has the right to hate a person for disliking what they think or do... and I am not a political person.
Actually when sked, most Americasn think GWB is OK, ANN is a bit pushy, but so is Rush Linbaugh, Howard Stern, Tom Hanks, and Tom Cruise,, ertc... so buttons...so
so much for hating...
2006-07-07 06:46:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by STROMBOLI-KRAKATOA JR 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well i can't speak for Ann..but as for Bush, the man is a total wanker. He is oblivious to the facts that his own actions (through stupidity or more likely..he knows what he is doing) have very very serious repercussions to anyone with a brain.
Basscatcher..you can copy and paste..i am shocked.
2006-06-23 20:35:15
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋