why don't governments choose solar & hydrogen as future energy sources instead of coal, nuclear & oil?

Answer 1

Because we still have plenty of coal, oil, and nuclear power supplies and will continue to use these until the world's entire infrastructure changes. Oil will surely continue to used until every last drop is gone, and the world is forced to use something else.

Answer 2

What has the government got to do with it? If you like solar or hydrogen, go buy some. No one is stopping you.

Answer 3

we would desire to apply classic components of means at the same time as coming up new technologies. i might choose to confirm us make investments plenty greater into the form of nuclear fusion technologies. they may well be plenty safer than the fission reactors presently getting used because of the fact the way warmth is generates is largely diverse. What occurred in Japan, for example, with their fission reactors purely might desire to no longer take place with fusion reactors. yet that technologies is years away. yet regardless, the greater moderen technologies might desire to be waiting to change the older ones gradually. Oil, gas and coal would be around for as long as they are greater least costly and greater effective than different techniques of becoming means. yet as those different technologies strengthen, we are able to certainly circulate faraway from fossil fuels.

Answer 4

energy companies give politicians BIG money to not change from the old oil/coal model for energy.

Answer 5

Fred is right....SUPPLY and DEMAND. When the DEMAND is great enough, the supply will be there. But the others are right as well, there isn't any $$ to be made, by either side of the equasion....gubermint or private.

Answer 6

They wouldn't be able to get Kick-backs from the sun, wind & air!!!

Big companies grease the US Politicians hand.

Answer 7

because they couldn't figure out a way to charge for the sun, water and wind.