I mean, c'mon shelly...first it was shumacher and ferrari and now its fernando alonso and renault
more fun watching rednecks go round & round for hours in NASCAR coz different winner/team every week/race
am curious if F1 viewership has suffered b/c of this fact, though you'd never know it from last race in silverstone a fortnite ago
2006-06-23 18:17:25 · 7 answers · asked by AtThePub 4 in Sports ➔ Auto Racing
Not really.
Last time (2005) he won by a whisker with Kimi breathing down his neck.
This time too, Michael is giving him a hard time.
May be because he has won the last 3 races in succession, the feeling of boredom has set in. But I reckon Michael and Ferrari are not out of steam yet, and Mclaren as usual will bring their act toghther later rather than sooner.
Boring is what Rossi is doing to motogp...
2006-06-23 19:58:33 · answer #1 · answered by apply112 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I object ur idea. Winning is not only the real sports mean. Even I'm Scumacher's fan. But for that, I cann't think that only Scumacher should win all the races. It's not fare. I can suggest for a few changes to make it more intresting
2006-06-25 02:49:23 · answer #2 · answered by Elegant 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I think NASCAR has no point. I can drive around my block 400 times too, so what?
2006-06-23 18:22:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
everything gets boring when there is dominance in a sport.. unless you really like that athlete..
can't say that i've watched in in a long time.
2006-06-23 18:48:07 · answer #4 · answered by smokes_girl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agreed. it's boring now that alonso always wins.
2006-06-24 23:52:56 · answer #5 · answered by h4il 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think u r right in 2004 M.SHUMACHER DOMINANCE now alonso
2006-06-24 02:02:01 · answer #6 · answered by confused guy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
2006-06-29 03:21:16 · answer #7 · answered by bhz122 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋