English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I need to get my company advertised and be able to market client's property at the same time. my real estate company is unique and I have found a nitch in the market.

2006-06-23 17:31:46 · 2 answers · asked by CHARLE 1 in Business & Finance Advertising & Marketing

2 answers

To get started, I suggest contacting the Small Business Administration Financing Page (SBA) – links below. Entrepreneur also offers a great site dedicated to money & finance – see below.

Research, research, research – this cannot be stressed enough. Read as much as you can. Here are some book titles that are relevant:

* Free Money for Small Businesses and Entrepreneurs by Laurie Blum
* Finding Money: The Small Business Guide to Financing (Small Business Series) by Kate Lister, Tom Harnish
* Financing Your Business Dreams With Other People's Money: How and Where to Find Money for Start-Up and Growing Businesses by Harold R. Lacy
* No Cash No Fear: Entrepreneurial Secrets to Starting Any Business with No Money by Terry Allen
* Starting on a Shoestring: Building a Business Without a Bankroll by Arnold S. Goldstein

There are plenty of free informational resources out there. Check the source box for links to articles.

Hope that helps! I wish you much success & happiness in all your ventures!

2006-06-24 06:09:33 · answer #1 · answered by TM Express™ 7 · 0 0

Obama's tax concept were released for months, and convinced. u.s.'s superb monetary era, at the same time as the middle class grew maximum, become when we had a lot extra imaginitive tax coverage. Trickle-Down, furnish-section, Reagonomics (even if you should call an same tax philosophy), theorized that if we diminished the load on the wealthy, it would stimulate monetary boom, which may in turn create jobs, and strengthen the middle class, at the same time as collectively increasing tax sales, because the authorities will be gathering decrease charges on a higher GDP. each and each component of that concept failed. The monetary gadget grew, yet no longer at charges higher than at the same time as u.s. had a extra imaginitive tax coverage, the operating class (those that were meant to be trickled on) have seen their genuine wages flat or decrease, and the authorities sales did not strengthen as theorized. Obama is suggesting a moderate shift in route of extra imaginitive tax coverage, and that i help that. i'd really help a miles extra aggressive shift in route of progressivity, possibly to the tax structure previously Reagan handed the most important center class tax strengthen in our international places heritage, TEFRA. Ronald Reagan decrease taxes for the wealthiest people from 70% to twenty-eight%, and did not decrease spending. because the country become no longer operating a surplue, the decreased tax gross sales (which become no longer replaced through the theorized smaller piece of a larger pie), become replaced through higher taxes on American workers, who account for 70% of our international locations monetary boom and what might want to no longer be shifted to the client class, become shifted to their little ones interior of one in all those deficit spending. The failure of furnish-section concept is they imagine that persons that produce stuff are the engine of the monetary gadget, and it thoroughly ignores the decision for component to the equation. This tax coverage has been crushing the middle class, and they only won't be able to have sufficient money to proceed increasing call for anymore, so it would not matter how nicely people take care of to furnish products, the demond of the overall monetary gadget is going down, which will deliver GDP down, which will shrink the wealth of the wealthiest people, and shrink the wide-spread of existence for each person. regulations that strengthen the middle class make u.s. a more desirable u . s . and grants you the manufacturers with more desirable, extra consistent lengthy monetary boom.

2016-11-15 04:49:10 · answer #2 · answered by poissant 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers