I thought the tape that appeared of bin laden in the days before the final news cycle and where voteres were solidifying their positions was a fake, doctored, or otherwise manipulated to make fear the guiding force of our voting rather than our hopes, dreams, and aspirations.
2006-06-23 17:03:24 · 21 answers · asked by oracle 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush would win beacue Kerry is still a dick
2006-06-23 17:05:55 · answer #1 · answered by itsallover 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
BUSH!! by 20 points
Why you need to keep rerunning this is beyond me. Kerry was a loser then and still is. The only thing he ever has done in the Senate is marry a rich widow. The Tape was real. Sorry to break it to you, but even Bin ladden knows the Dems are push overs. Kerry stood for nothing other than "I'am not Bush." That does not win General elections........
And as for the kooks whining about voting machines? It's bull. I worked the Polls for years. Nobody is rigging anything. Face facts, Dems Suck and we really don't need them taxing, spending or setting up puting morons like Cynthia Mc Kinney or Dick Durbin in charge of something........
2006-06-23 17:30:50 · answer #2 · answered by lana_sands 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush. The elections were rigged by Diebold ballot-less voting machines in key locations. Diebold's CEO said on many occasions he would do anything to see Bush elected and made good on the promise with faulty software. There never was a 2004 "election" but instead an appointment. You don't think the rich and big business were going to take a chance that somebody who wouldn't do their bidding as directed was going to be elected do you? The last election was 1996 and it was indeed, the last election, ever, for this country.
2006-06-23 17:13:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, as any Liberal will say about ANYTHING that goes against their views: "It's a lie, lie lie... it was doctored, blah blah" Face the facts.
And for the question, Bush would win because the drive by media wants you to think Libs are doing so good but when it comes to an election in the middle of a war this serious, no one wants to elect a guy that wants to pull out, cut and run, cut and jog, or "re-deploy" as they now call it.
They especially don't want to vote for someone that says "I voted for the war before I voted against it."
2006-06-23 17:36:05 · answer #4 · answered by Boob 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Gore much better than Kerry, but if a snapshot would have been taken bush would have never won and this country would be far better off and have far fewer dead!
Unfortunately they body bags continue and bush is focused on how he can make things worse than they already are.
The revelation about secret programs watching money. I really think we are losing control of this country. This guy does anything he wants, never asks, doesn't care if he violates the Constitution, or treaties, steals right in front of our faces and he can't open his mouth without lying.
2006-06-23 17:14:52 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush would win. I shudder to think what would have happened to our country after 9/11 if Kerry had been president.
Liberals need to think about the consequences of all these radical agendas they scream and whine about. The conservatives are the serious and rational ones who are looking out for the future of this country and the longest-lasting peace of the world.
2006-06-23 17:49:55 · answer #6 · answered by rocknrollfawn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush. Simply because Kerry is still changing his mind about things and that he supported the War the whole time until a week ago at the take back America thing where he said he didn't back the war.
--------------------------
I agree with fr_chuck. Kerry is among the most radical politicians and is not even trusted within his own party.
2006-06-23 17:09:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush because the same reasons he won in 2000 and 2004
2006-06-23 19:40:02 · answer #8 · answered by MIKE B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush would win, not because more people would actually vote for him, but because the apparatus of stealing the election was clearly in place and remains so (Debold machines, corrupt local and state officials). The know how to do it now.
2006-06-23 17:15:56 · answer #9 · answered by Michael R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kerry could only get 13 votes for his bill the other day and thats his democratic senator friends. And thats probably all he would get if it were a presidential election held tommorow.
2006-06-23 17:10:19 · answer #10 · answered by pigpen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush still only because no matter how bad people think he is, Kerry is still much worst,
Even the Democrats are not supporting him any longer
( look at the vote onhis bill this week)
2006-06-23 17:07:22 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋