English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Okay here is the deal. the zodiac...an ancient form of "prediction/furture telling, etc etc etc." was based on the movement of stars and planets and there relation to each other and ourselves as humans, in our behavior and personalities, etc....okay well, since the planets and stars...being other galaxies, etc. have moved...expanded through time. our calendar has shifted somewhat also. so in that respect your sign...you birth sign that is...may not be your "true sign", math is involved, and an understanding of how the sky has changed, shifted, moved and expanded over time...but in a nut shell. Your sign....say a thousand years ago, would have been totally different from today. how does that settle with you? do you still feel strongly that your sign is correct, or does it make more sense for you since you might identify with another sign than your own?

2006-06-23 15:54:12 · 12 answers · asked by ? 6 in Entertainment & Music Horoscopes

12 answers

I think it's all just for fun anyway ,i don't take it to serious,i just have fun with it.

2006-06-23 16:01:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

yap, I know what you say by 'identifying with another sign then your own'. It's all about the Ascendant you have. He makes you seem another type of zodiac sign. By the older we get the influence of the Ascendant is more pregnant. Don't scare, you are prepared to deal with this change.

and to know it you can try searching web. birth charts. My signs work for me and I am convinced that you'll feel the differences whan one of the signs you have is more 'seenable' one day and thae day after, the other.

2006-06-23 17:45:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

My sign is definitely correct. I am a textbook Leo.

To get a more accurate reading though, I think you can find someone to do research based on time of birth, place of birth...

2006-06-23 16:35:01 · answer #3 · answered by girlysledgirl 3 · 0 0

I'm definitely a LEO. I was even born two weeks late. After spending all these years as a Leo it's hard to imagine being a Cancer. It was meant to be. Plus, I don't put all my faith into astrology. It's a tool, but not the entire establishment.

2006-06-23 19:06:04 · answer #4 · answered by dhalia_1977 4 · 0 0

It is true that the astronomical zodiac does not exactly match up with the astrological zodiac any more (due to the precession of the equinoxes), but who cares? It still seems to work.

2006-06-23 17:06:51 · answer #5 · answered by Diane D 5 · 0 0

Oh yeah, mine's correct. I'm a Sagittarius all the way. Outgoing, extremely talkative, artsy, flaky, temperamental, spontaneous....my husband is a Capricorn, poor bastard.

2006-06-24 02:02:55 · answer #6 · answered by Melanie 3 · 0 0

My sign is definetly correct. There is only one other sign that comes close. But mine is still correct. Really weird first time I read about signs. It freaked me out because it was me, exactly.

2006-06-23 15:58:25 · answer #7 · answered by zenkitty27 5 · 0 0

My sign is my true sign...I'm the most stubborn, loyal, and sexually jealous person ever. Just like a Taurus.

2006-06-23 19:14:34 · answer #8 · answered by Heather 2 · 0 0

i am a virgo but I am most like a Capricorn. BUt one thing about virgos that is like me is one of my sayings for life (my other is:If I ain't happy; ain't nobody happy):

Reason rules life
And I live to it strongly

2006-06-23 16:50:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ya sign in all the way true only.it never betrays.astrologers may fail but astology never

2006-06-24 04:09:16 · answer #10 · answered by shankara1978 1 · 0 0

I am definately a Capricorn... Never doubted it.

2006-06-24 11:48:14 · answer #11 · answered by Mark G 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers