According to tradition, the person who is referred to as "the disciple that Jesus loved" was the disciple John.
It is important to note that the this John, who was beloved of Jesus, was not the author of the Gospel book known as John. Nowhere in the book does it say that John is the author.
This clarifies things a bit--so we don't have to think of John writing about himself in the third person and calling himself the discple that Jesus loved.
It is also fair to say that this beloved individual is also not identified by name, so we cannot say for sure that it was indeed the disciple John. We only have the tradition that says so.
2006-06-23 12:06:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ponderingwisdom 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
John
2006-06-23 11:51:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
John
2006-06-23 11:51:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by tesorotx 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here is food for thought. Jesus loved all his disciples equally because each were different. He preached to love all equally and treat each other as your brother. All men are created equal. To love and forgive your enemies and pray for them. Why did Jesus take in Judas - He loved him. He knew that Judas would betray him. So he needed Judas to betray him so that the rest of mankind could survive. So that Jesus could take the sins of the world with him when he was crucified. Therefore he must have loved Judas equally as much - if not more so - because he relied on him betraying him so that mankind would go on and hate Judas forever. In Jesus' death have we not all benefited? Then what about Judas?
2006-06-23 12:33:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Doctor Mum 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The reference is regarded as John--who became made to be the narrator of the Gospel yet became no longer the author of the Gospel of John. The Gospel of John became in all likelihood written through human beings from the lineage of John. I once study notes of a particular Bible pupil (i am going to't save in recommendations his call) who believed that the Gospel of John became easily a gospel from the Magdalinean lineage and that, for a number of politically maximum recommendations-blowing causes, the narrator of the gospel became made to be the disciple John, no longer Mary. The Gospel of John is seen to contain content cloth it truly is more effective such as Gnostic texts than the different gospels. inspite of the actual undeniable actuality that Mary Magdaline figures prominently in some Gnostic texts, the completed lore about her being the spouse of Christ and all is theory, popularized through a fictional paintings wide-spread because the DaVinci Code. that is in all likelihood that the Gnostic writers were expressing recommendations in a figurative, metaphorical, symbolic, and mystical way, no longer an historic way. inspite of the actual undeniable actuality that provided as heritage, the classic gospels are probable relate legend no longer heritage.
2016-11-15 04:34:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
John the Beloved, also known as John the Revalator.
2006-06-23 11:54:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by The Keeper 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mary Magdalene or John you decide
2006-06-23 11:51:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jude
2006-06-23 11:58:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Oleg B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Zoloft
2006-06-23 11:57:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It was John. He referred to himself this way in his book.
2006-06-23 11:51:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by heeboy3 4
·
0⤊
0⤋