2006-06-23 09:22:43 · 18 answers · asked by Billy 3 in Health ➔ General Health Care ➔ Other - General Health Care
No, I think you would like only 4 fingers. The little one just gets in the way.
2006-06-23 09:26:00 · answer #1 · answered by parshooter 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
After removing your finger you may not like your hand (finger removal tends to do that). After trying to deal with it, you decide to remove the hand and now your arm looks really stumpy; Off with the arm. Now your whole torso gets messed up. You know, eccentric and unable to carry a backpack. With your spine all slanted and askew, your head tilted to the side to make up the balance, it's just a mess.
Off with your head, that's where the trouble all started to begin with. That's why it's bad form to loose your head over a little finger, that sticks out like a sore thumb only in need of some acceptance to begin with :)
2006-06-23 09:38:38 · answer #2 · answered by ghost 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it did no longer duvet *the finished element*, no. If it become purely the mandatory illnesses, i'd the two supply up a fingertip--each of ways all the way down to the final knuckle, purely previous the fingernail--or i'd purely supply up a pinky toe. comparable quantity and variety of tissue somewhat. i do no longer see why the disfigurement is needed although: alligators and crocodiles are already proof against many maximum serious illnesses and infections, by using potential of potential of having an "implicit immune equipment" of their blood. Peptides. Antibacterial and antifungal concerns of their bloodstream. human beings purely get one or 2 of those issues at maximum. Your ordinary 'gator has *28*. circulate be sure. So it rather is achievable devoid of dropping palms and feet. *lol*
2016-12-13 18:24:37 · answer #3 · answered by rivalee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, its just very weird. Unless you mean your penis. And you kind of need that, so yeah, a bit wrong I'd say.
And I believe that if there is nothing wrong with your little finger, insurance won't pay to have it removed.
2006-06-23 09:26:58 · answer #4 · answered by emogene209 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not wrong, but that's a bad reason for doing so.
Besides, you're not going to have a good story to tell on why you have four fingers on one hand. You know those stories "well I put my hand on a aligator and he managed to snag my pinky" as opposed to your "well I don't like it anymore, so I removed it."
That's dumb.
2006-06-23 09:37:35 · answer #5 · answered by Carolina 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not wrong, but once you start you'll only notice the imperfections in the rest of your fingers. then wrists. then fore arms etc. soon you'll have removed everything and be nothing but an imperfect cell. go for it. it's called natural selection.
2006-06-23 09:35:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd like to see you try to do things without it. You'd probably end up regretting it. And then you would be screwed. So the answer is yes, it probably would be wrong.
2006-06-23 09:26:05 · answer #7 · answered by jannabanana 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would look worse than just about any problem you have with that finger right now.
2006-06-23 09:26:03 · answer #8 · answered by Olive Green Eyes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I removed my little toe because it kept talking to me late at night. Kinda wish I'd waited instead of doing it myself..............ha ha
2006-06-23 09:26:35 · answer #9 · answered by nonleigh 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOPE GO ALL OUT MAN! TAKE 'EM ALL OFF...LOL,
seriously though, keep it, you thank yourself someday.
2006-06-23 09:25:59 · answer #10 · answered by boardr 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋