I'm having a lot of trouble believing it, but at the same time, it totally fits me! I'm an Aries.
2006-06-24 08:44:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Susie 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
WHen I began doing ink art I read a book on astrology as I wanted to incorporate the star patterns and symbols in my drawings. I deduced that I had characteristics of ALL the signs and was more a gene based individual. You would be surprised at how many fit your cosmic profile but NO ONE fits your gene profile except YOU.
2006-06-23 16:26:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by renalinder 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is impossible ascertain the exact time of origin of our astrology. Even the most famous historians differ wildly, from 1200 BC to 2500 BC while trying to fix our Vedic period. A lot of them, especially the westerners, still study India based on the Mahenjadaro and Harappan discoveries, which were discovered in the 1920’s!! Several archeological discoveries of recent times date our culture to 7500 BC, making it the ancient most civilization in the world. Our astrology has details of the horoscopes of Lord Krishna, Lord Rama and many other ancient Indian kings and queens, recorded thousands of years ago. The Bhishma Parva and Udyoga Parva chapters of Mahabharata mention many astrological descriptions and omens just before the Mahabharata war. It also describes a period of draught with several planetary combinations. There is also a very clear reference about two eclipses, a solar eclipse and a lunar eclipse occurring, creating a rare 13 day lunar fortnight. Available scientific research data shows that the Mahabharata war must have occurred either in 3129 BC or 2559 BC. According to the Hindu Panchangas, maintained from ages, Kaliyuga era is counted from February 17/18 midnight 3102 BC. Hindu epics like Mahabharata and Ramayana have been written off as myths by the western historians. However the recent discovery of the submerged ancient city Dwaraka, (the site of the legendary city of Lord Krishna, which got submerged in the sea after the death of Lord Krishna), led by Dr. S.R. Rao of the Marine Archaeology Unit of the National Institute of Oceanography of India lends a lot of credence to our mythology. Various texts attribute the origin of Indian astrology..
2006-06-23 18:42:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by kam 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe that the stars influence us.
But I do believe that some things that are not scientifically valid, can still be meaningful for us.
It can be fun to read a horoscope in the newspaper, and sometimes what we read may give us a new perspective on a situation.
And for a person who finds this helpful and meaningful, that is real enough.
2006-06-24 04:30:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Triple M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scientifically, astrology is bunk. There are no statistical proofs available that being born under a certain sign is an accurate assessment of one's personality or traits.
2006-06-23 16:43:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
astrology is probably not real but me as an Aquarius love reading my horoscope just 4 fun sometimes it even shows a resemblance to peoples everyday life
2006-06-23 16:22:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by DDTHAPPINESS 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i beleive it is all relative, there are many truths to about your astrological sign and your characteristics however there are many individuals that don't have the same traits as it is stated by their sign. I think no one should study astrology as an exact science...Use it as you may but don't live your life by it!!!
2006-06-23 16:41:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pisces Princess 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
For some people it is.
2006-06-23 16:19:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by lynda_is 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i believe it is.almost everyting in my astrology book about the different signs and their habits almost always prove their self to be true
2006-06-23 23:12:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Villain 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes ofcourse astrologers may fail but astrology not
2006-06-24 12:04:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by shankara1978 1
·
0⤊
0⤋