Ok if the omega (is that the right word) is actually equall to 1 then the universe will eventually stop expanding right? BUT stars will keep collapsing and forming black holes. And the stars that arent big enough to make black holes will still collide and draw in other objects. So EVENTUALLY wont all the solar bodies (black holes, stars, dwarfs,plantes, etc) be drawn into one another and become a single singularity?
2006-06-23
09:03:06
·
10 answers
·
asked by
StoneWallKid
2
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space
so if black holes fade themselves out in radiation. Can that radiation become somthing else? like another star i want to say can it turn to mass but im not sure thats correct
2006-06-23
09:13:21 ·
update #1
No, the big crunch theory was thrown out a while ago when new data from Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). It said that the universe's inflation velocity is getting faster rather than slower from the mass in it. it may be from many things as theories suggest like anti-gravity particles. So in the end to "preresolve" any future questions from this the universe will end with matter losing it's radioactivity and it will end in cold not heat as in the big crunch.
2006-06-23 11:11:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by cosmologist dude 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Assuming omega is equal to one (which is far from certain) the universe will eventually stop expanding. Stars will burn and since the matter in the universe will be to far away from one another at the time to be pulled together by gravity to form new ones, no new stars will form. Eventually only various dark bodies will remain: black dwarfs, rocks, dust, gas, neutron stars and black holes. But black holes don't last forever - they vaporise (Read A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking). The effect isn't noticable now because for that to happen the temperature of the black hole has to be higher than that of it's surrounding. However, the universe if filled with leftover radiation from the Big Bang that is just over 2K degrees above absolute zero - still higer then that of black holes. As the univese expands that energy grows cooler. When that happens they will give away matter very slowly, atom by atom until there is nothing left. So the univese won't be oine giant black hole - it will just be an unimaginably vast almost empty space.
2006-06-23 09:05:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by evil_tiger_lily 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not many people truly know what will happen. I don't give this much thought due to the constant debate of the creation of the universe by a divine entity or just from a random "big bang". Yet, IMO, "antimatter" (unexplainable matter made from pure energy) might have to do something w/ creation and destruction of the universe. Some scientists were able to achieve antimatter creation by firing high-velocity particles at dense matter and the result was "matter" created from the energy of the high velocity impact. Black holes may have a similar result & have created leaking parallel twins called "white" holes. Who knows, maybe our the destruciton of our whole universe will finish building an alternative one called an "antiverse", made entirely of antimatter.
2006-06-23 09:36:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because we can only theorize as to what will become of our Universe it is not out of reason to suggest that our Universe could become one big blackhole. Now, imagine this>>>> if this were to happen and the black hole became so big and it's gravity so extrememly immense then it would be possible for the blackhole to lose stability and explode outward from a SECOND "big bang", thereby creating a new universe.
2006-06-30 09:45:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
not really. black holes are themselves emmiting radiation (and stong one at that). that means they're losing energy. eventually they'll fade out as well.
new studies about dark matter have raised questions about traditional future universe scenarios : whereas some 10 years ago it was believed that the universe will simply cool off and homogenize (it this correct?) itself, to a equal energy level, with particles randomly flying around from place to place, now they're (the scientists) not so sure how the universe will eventually end, if indeed it will ever.
2006-06-23 09:08:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
there's a wealth of opinion in this. even if, the interior mechanics of black holes are fairly prepared and dense. for that reason, residing remember with the potential to contemplate their existence and starting up will be unable to operate in the scheme of Thermodynamics. for instance, contained in the shape horizon, remember is spaghettified and despatched spiraling inward to the singularity. there is not any consistent evidence that we are critically stretched in the course of the cosmos, inspite of if relative reference frames do no longer limit such habit or the increasing time needed to achieve the singularity's floor (so as that progression isn't impeded).
2016-11-15 04:24:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2006-06-23 09:06:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rocket Scientist X 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes but that is when the big bang happens again and it all starts over
2006-06-23 09:20:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by mi_gl_an 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
boy, that would really suck
2006-06-23 09:45:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kenny ♣ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
maybe
2006-06-23 09:06:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Amanda 2
·
0⤊
0⤋