We have heard many issues regarding Darwins Theory...
To date, I have not been able to find out at that very moment when life supposedily brought inself into being(now give that some thought).
How does something coalesce, self-actualize by accident(and just wake up, like I'm here! Life!), have a semi-permiable membrane, a digestive system, a sensing system to be aware in some way of it's surroundings, and also this has to have some sort of function in the grand scheme, like, am I a virus, or an amoeba...but what to eat as well since I am #1...this is a paradox on a level of Adam and Eve, yet both require a quantum leap of faith to believe.
Any thoughts?
2006-06-23 08:05:49 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
First of all, the theory you're talking about is Abiogenesis, not evolution. Darwin has nothing to do with Abiogenesis, his theory only covers the slow evolution of existing species.
Secondly - 'accidents' aren't part of any of these theories. Only particles, molecules and organisms acting according to the laws of physics. Proteins naturally form complex chains, there's no 'accident' involved. Also, there is a great deal of life out there that doesn't have a digestive system, semi-permeable membranes, or senses - spend some time studying microbiology.
The most simple forms of 'life' on this planet are barely so - there's no one large leap from non-life to life, but rather very gradual degrees.
2006-06-23 08:16:14 · answer #1 · answered by weofui 2 · 3⤊ 8⤋
Yeah that's right.When you start going back everything like science and spirituality goes back to ground zero.Everyone is trying to learn the same.But actually life on earth was because of Panspermia.So we shouldn't really be seeking answers to all these.
Good luck.
2006-06-23 15:09:55 · answer #2 · answered by Eternity 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My favorite is this:
So life was formed. Then it immediately found something to eat.
2006-06-23 15:08:50 · answer #3 · answered by Paul McDonald 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋