English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

But it’s considered ok to send thousands to their death based on lies and distorted reality, and to turn our once free country into a neo-fascist state? I'm not condoning what Clinton did. I think he's an adultering pig. But, how was he impeachably worse than Mr. Clueless?

2006-06-23 07:15:32 · 10 answers · asked by MaRcO DaRkO 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

I stand corrected, I mispoke in referring what Clinton was impeached for, however substitute that and answer the question.

2006-06-23 07:19:49 · update #1

10 answers

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath. And ask Vince Foster's family about Clinton's values.

2006-06-23 07:19:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Clinton was not impeached for the Offense, he was Impeached for lying Under Oath which is a Felony.

By the way evidence has been uncovered that Iraq did have WMDs but I suppose you hate Bush that much to not even care that Clinton signed an executive order making the removal of Saddam a priority.

Bush followed the Clinton order.

2006-06-23 07:20:11 · answer #2 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 0 0

The problem was not the sex (nobody cares about that except some frigid housewife), the problem was that he violated the foundations of this nation, the rule of law, when he lied under oath. That act is in fact a "high crime or misdemeanor," and as such an impeachable offense.

2006-06-23 07:29:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What it all comes down to is Lying! If he had told the truth, he would have been better off. People would have respected the fact that he told the truth. Many, many other officials and past presidents have had sex with different people, they are just careful not to get caught, or rather they have enough money and influence not to get caught.

2006-06-23 07:29:19 · answer #4 · answered by sam04m 3 · 0 0

They impeached him for lying under oath. He was acquitted by the senate.

2006-06-23 07:19:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Clinton may not be able to run his family very well, but he ran the country GREAT. What is wrong with a hummer now and then to relax you?

2006-06-23 07:23:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Let's have a little respect for the office and carry on your adulterous affairs where they don't gather so much media attention. Of course, unless you want it that way.

2006-06-23 07:23:20 · answer #7 · answered by warrentalb 2 · 0 0

It isn't. Its impeachable to lie under oath.

And he wasn't.

2006-06-23 07:16:41 · answer #8 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0 0

he was impeached for lying

2006-06-23 07:17:31 · answer #9 · answered by chicago85thst 1 · 0 0

blah blah blah get over it

2006-06-23 07:18:22 · answer #10 · answered by smartmitch 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers