Wow the Libs go nuts when someone dares criticize their point of view but it's just fine for them to say that Bush is an idiot. It's a the same double standard that when we Killed that piece of filth Zarkawi they cried "Were his rights violated?" but think noting wen two of our guys were murdered and their bodies desecrated.
2006-06-23 06:55:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
The women had a agenda. But because of their grief we are not allowed to criticize them. Liberals are hypocrites
Ann Coulter is right. These women made millions of dollars and spent it on boob jobs and flat screen TV's
Im sorry that their husbands died but they are definately allowable targets
from newsbusters.org
The 9/11 Commission was a scam and a fraud, the sole purpose of which was to cover up the disasters of the Clinton administration and distract the nation's leaders during wartime. Not only did the Jersey Girls claim credit for this Clinton whitewash machine, they spent most of the hearings denouncing the Bush administration for not stopping the 9/11 attacks from the weak position handed it by the Clinton administration."
The gist of what Kristen Breitweiser, Lorie Van Auken, Mindy Kleinberg and Patty Casazza claimed was that an August 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing should have alerted Bush to order immediate action to prevent 9/11.
The number one fact missed by the media was that Coulter was attacking the knee-jerk support that the "Jersey Girls" had for Bill Clinton, demonstrating that their first priority was not "getting to the bottom" of whom to blame for 9-11, but instead to score political points againts Bush.
2006-06-23 06:43:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by smitty031 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They're not mad at her because of her points, it's because she can't make a point without tossing out insults left and right (well, I guess never to the right).
She's nothing more than a sensationalist mudslinger and nothing she says will ever be legitimate because she isn't taking part in the discussion, she's dragging it into the mud.
Oh, and Anne Coulter is out in the spotlight, so she'd better learn to handle being called the name's she's being called.
I can't believe that you would even pretend to defend her even for a second without seeing right through her tactics. She writes all of her books about how insulting liberals are and then she gets defensive when she gets attacked and insulted.
Put your time into someone like Will or Buckley and stop defending someone who only makes a conservative point of view look like the lifestyle choice for nasty shrews.
ADDED NOTE:
I took the Ann Coulter or Hitler quiz and got most of them right because I could recognize Coulter's horrible grammar. She's as nasty and mean as Hitler (she has called for the slaughter of Muslims and the cleansing of their religion - so don't even try to say otherwise), she just can't write as effectively.
2006-06-23 06:42:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by WBrian_28 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
IMHO there are liberals who are mad at her not just because there might be a glimmer of truth in what she says they can't reasonably rebut. But also because they are so locked into their own ideas they can't even consider the possibility someone would disagree with them. Anyone who does so MUST be an idiot. Therefore they should be degraded into remaining silent.
I've noticed of all the derogatory things said about Ms. Coulter, few of them actually had anything to do with what she wrote.
And just so you don't think me totally on here side. God save me from the extremes of the right and the left.
2006-06-23 07:00:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ann Coulter didn't make any good points. She is just making points about red herrings that distract from the really important issues.
Ann Coulter is not elected, not appointed and doesn't have any credentials that make her any more or less credible than the people she criticizes.
2006-06-23 06:41:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yea,. well sure it can be argued that these widows did in fact out themselfs out there ,.. but does that excuse Ann from being a Moron,. which she is ,. those were some really terrible things she said about them ,... totally uncalled for ,.She just a mean sob,. and someone has to explain this too you ,.. ??? and what exactly did these ladies do to deserve the attack anyway , voice their opinions, funny, that's what i though we did in this country
2006-06-23 06:44:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hard 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You might want to check this out. It's a very eye-opening look at what goes on in Ann Coulter's bizarro mind.
http://www.people.virginia.edu/~jac3he/GiveUpQuiz/hitlercoulterquiz.html
2006-06-23 06:43:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by oh kate! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
People are not mad because she has made some good points. They are mad because she has made so many MORE bad, hateful ones. If she wants to be a lightning rod, she needs to put on her big girl panties and suck it up (as do her supporters) when lightning strikes.
2006-06-23 06:44:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Christina D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, she didn't make a good point, she merely stated her biased opinion.
It's not her opinion that ticks people off, its the manner in which she chose to express it. She used the bully tactic of name-calling and mud-slinging. The world would be better off without her.
2006-06-23 06:50:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by scott j 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude I'm not mad, but she's had her 15 minutes of fame and, well, time to move on to them WMD's doncha think?
2006-06-23 06:40:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Truth 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, people are mad at her because she is a cruel, heartless bigot who cares only for her own publicity.
2006-06-23 06:39:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋