or is it one of the many attemps for this administration to frame someone to make it look like they are actually doing something to foil terrorist attacts.
2006-06-23 06:06:25 · 6 answers · asked by Urntrede frdtrut 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Terrorists wannabes -- I don't believe they were innocent. But I don't believe they were serious threats. Worth arresting, not worth the Attorney General making a big deal about.
2006-06-23 06:10:00 · answer #1 · answered by C_Bar 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It sounds like they wanted to kill innocent people in a big way. We should be glad they were caught before they pulled it off. I don't think this was rigged or political. Just a bunch of weirdos who want to kill you and me.
"Wannabees" or "small-time" doesn't matter. If they pulled off one of their plans, there would have been a lot of dead people.
We've got to give credit were credit is due for their capture on this one!
2006-06-23 13:23:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No i think they r terriorist almost everyday now thier is a raid of some sort they were planning to bomb the sears tower and the FBI buildings so i think they r terriost
2006-06-23 13:11:20 · answer #3 · answered by joe11271990 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They sound like misfits to me. Posers. But if they were about to do harm, they deserve to have the book thrown at them. In fact, they deserve to get it in the neck for even posing, for wasting law enforcement resources.
------------------
You have to understand, this Administration is desperate for anything that will make itslef look competent - no matter how far-fetched.
2006-06-23 13:21:57 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. October 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you dont live here, good stay there, if you do live here, go somewhere else we dont need any idealog flaming liberals we have far to many already bent distributing bs propaganda.
2006-06-23 13:18:15 · answer #5 · answered by skyyn777 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah. i bet they arent!! wierd thing is that they didnt find any weapons with those guys. hmmmmm.........
they sure are a big threat.
2006-06-23 13:11:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋