Why do they feel the need to expose every effort the Bush administration is doing to protect us? Why are they siding with the terrorist by uncovering the methods put in place to track and capture them? Do they really think that they are providing a service to Americans by telling the enemy what we are doing? Don't they realize that they are helping to turn everyone (except the terrorist) away from them and the democraps? They are fullfilling the term TRAITOR. Are they the modern day Benedict Arnold?
2006-06-23 05:06:19 · 9 answers · asked by therandman 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What you ididot libs call truth telling is aiding and informing the emeny how we are tracking them. I knew this question would be tough for simple minded libs who have no respect for America.
2006-06-23 06:04:00 · update #1
i disagree with them on there polices on how to win this war and the reporting of every thing .that why i don't read their paper any more.they go to for .and so do the ajc.in Atlanta.just to dam far .
2006-06-23 05:12:49 · answer #1 · answered by idontkno 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
There was a time when the press was considered the fourth branch. We relied on them to protect us from an over-reaching government and to uncover corruption.
The NYT is doing their job. The myth of the liberal media bias has created a public mistrust of anything other than Fox News.
Although, here's what Rich Bond (Bush I's campaign manager)had to say about it:
"Rich Bond, then chair of the Republican Party, complained during the 1992 election, "I think we know who the media want to win this election--and I don't think it's George Bush." The very same Rich Bond, however, also noted during the very same election, "There is some strategy to it [bashing the 'liberal' media].... If you watch any great coach, what they try to do is 'work the refs.' Maybe the ref will cut you a little slack on the next one."
Here's what Bill Krystol had to say:
"I admit it," he told a reporter. "The liberal media were never that powerful, and the whole thing was often used as an excuse by conservatives for conservative failures."
Just a few. It was a political strategy. It always has been. They aren't traitors. They are keeping an over-reaching government who has committed more than one crime in their so-called "war on terror".
Honestly, your use of language could be considered libel (since you've written it).
If Gonzales gets his way and starts going after Newspapers, then the US will have entered a brand new territory resembling only the most right-wing fascist dictatorships. The press is protected by the First Amendment. If you start tearing up the most vital of Constitutional protections, then you 'bout as well invite the terrorists in, because this country would no longer be worth saving.
2006-06-23 05:41:38 · answer #2 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds to me such as you opt to do away with yet another one in all our civil liberties, "Freedom of the clicking". somebody's have been given to tell the certainty. It specific isn't Fox. There are talk shows for evaluations..they should not be presented as "information". that is unhappy to work out that Georgie Jr. nevertheless has defenders. human beings could stop already with the labels...did it matter if the human beings interior the twin towers have been republican or democrat. They reported comparable issues approximately Woodward & Bernstein and Watergate. you may stay in Texas whilst you evaluate it incredibly is the only state i've got seen earnings interior the previous few years. yet I waft off. have faith me the ny situations would not reveal all place of foundation secure practices secrets and techniques. have faith me the enemy is conscious what we are doing and what they are doing. enable's do what we've been meant to -- get Bin Lauden and placed across our little ones domicile. In parting, who became into it that needed to open N.J. ports to Arabs? Who cut back secure practices investment to N.J. and extra beneficial it for states like Wyoming?
2017-01-02 06:01:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The randman thinks he be sensible necon,only to reveal himself as a brainwsahed bushie.Happens with many sexless shut-ins.
2006-06-23 05:43:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good grief, Charlie Brown.
2006-06-23 05:08:50 · answer #5 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its called the telling the truth!! which is the job of the media, they not suppose to kiss up to bush like you. their doing their job, and let them do it. thomas jefferson once said "a true patriot is one who questions his or her country when it is wrong". think about it.
2006-06-23 05:27:11 · answer #6 · answered by david c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's called freedom of the press.
2006-06-23 05:17:56 · answer #7 · answered by Huh? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unless i am mistaken sir,
you are having a hissy fit.
2006-06-23 05:43:05 · answer #8 · answered by nefariousx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are not trying to kill me, it is only you.
2006-06-23 05:12:15 · answer #9 · answered by beren 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋