Why are liberals siding with the terrorists?

Question

They are siding with a group that would like nothing more than to kill them and their children, cut their heads off, and throw them in a ditch.

Answer 1

Simply put, liberals are stupid. They think they are fighting for a cause, but in reality they are only damaging America. They get so wrapped up in everyone else's problems they don't even see their own. They don't see that having sympathy for the terrorists is threatning America. I did a paper on domestic terrorism, and it was shocking what I found. Groups like PETA and ELF, they will set fires to things in order to save a tree! The PETA people would give up their own children to save a dog. Now, that's disturbing... To me, it seems like liberals like every country BUT America... and that really pisses me off! I have no doubt there are liberals in America right now harboring terrorists because they think that it is better to help them out than their own country. It's a sad, sad world...

Answer 2

It is not that liberals are siding with the terrorists. It is that liberals are siding with the constitution, something I doubt very seriously that you have read. Least you would not have asked such a proganda driven question. You see its really very simple the only thing that protects you from a corrupt government is that document. If this run away power hungry administration is not put in its place by the very document that they vowed to uphold, defend and preserve. Well lets put it this way, the compounds that halliburton is building in the United States will be filled with citizens who thought that liberals were siding with the terrorists. It is not a democratic or republican thing, it is not about taking sides it is about the constitution the foundation this country was built upon. It is about treason. It is about believing your above the law, why else would Mr.G.W.Bush have 750 signing statements, more than all the presidents before him combined. It is about stolen elections. It is about illegal wars. It is about voilations of the geneva conventions treaty which America is a signatory, which America help to draft. It is about robery of the treasury. It is about mass murder in New York City to which no criminal investigation has occurred. You can believe I am a liberal if you choose. I am mostly a firm believer in the constitution. The problems we face today did not occur when G.W.Bush entered office they occurred long before 2000. The 2000 election was the first strike at the foundation of this country, 911 was the second strike, 2004 was a bigger assult on our right to vote. The patriot act was intended to shread the constitution. Do you know what the next strike will be? I doubt it! But I will state that there was a power down in the peoples house in Washington D.C. the first week of April, and the WTC's had a power down before their collapse into dust. I will state that most assuredly if we do not demand the indictment of this criminal element occupying our highest offices there will be another attack and if that happens you can bet the last dollar you will ever earn that they plan on suspending the Constitution and implementing Martial Law. We have lost so many rights granted to us by God almighty and upheld by the constitutionand upsurped by crooked polititans. When will you become a responsible citizen and become informed about what is really going on? I realize it is most likely easier to sit on the side line and throw out talking points, but every now and again you will run in to someone who is informed and will shoot you down and expose you for the fraud you are. The terrorists, who is to say who they really are? I believe that the same people who told you they were responsible for 911 are the same people who swore they had WMD's in Iraq. Do you realize that a spoke person for the FBI came out last week and stated that they did not have any hard evidence to link Osma Bin Laden to the attack on the WTC.s? Can you believe them. Can you believe the Warren report? Did you believe when they told the lie, we have no soilders in Cambodia?
Did you believe that it was okay to use the military against the Citizens in Waco, where 81 children, women and men were left dead by our own government. The only thing that I can say is if you believed all those lies, no doubt you still believe in Santa Clause and the toothfairy.

Answer 3

What the hell are you smoking? I'm a liberal and last time I checked, I had no terrorist friends, relatives or associates. Now ask your old pal DUHbya the same question...And since when did asking our government when we are going to actually pursue the terrorists that did indeed kill Americans on 9/11 become siding with terrorists?? I just want to know where Osama Bin Laden is and why he is still at large. Your President is too busy pursuing his own interests and the interests of his co-horts to track down the criminals that actually attacked us. If you would put down your crack-pipe for a minute and actually looked at our country, maybe you would see why there's so much dissension. And if you really believe that WE'RE the ones siding with the terrorists, you've been smoking that pipe for way too long.

Answer 4

Because for some asinine reason they think this will help win the hearts and minds of Americans.
Because they see it as their duty to dissent - you know that's how to be a patriot.
Because they like hearing their talking points come from Al Qaida leaders
Because Muslims terrorist are the new voters that they are seeking
Because they are blinded by pure hate for Duyba
Because they won't look at themselves and realize that they only offer criticism and whining
Because they would rather convict our troops instead of the terrorist that cut off heads and blow up people
Because they are panderers
Because they have a serious mental disorder

Answer 5

Because liberals hate america. Its as simple as that. They are more of a danger to us than the terrorists themselves. The only reason the terrirists don't give up is because they're counting on their liberal allies, the american press and the demonrats, to give them the victory they can't achieve on their own. Just like in Viet Nam.

Answer 6

This is a weird question seeing how a lot of government officials who are republican have ties with saudi arabia and oil companies abroad. Here's an example of a conservative "wahh wahh wahh the liberals, wahh wahh, my pu$$y hurts, wahh wahh wahh" and here's an example of a liberal "wahh wahh wahh, the conservatives, wahh wahh wahh, my pu$$y hurts, wahh wahh wahh". As for JM's answer what are you trying to say, that people need to agree with the president or they are terrorists. So if he has a plan and i don't agree with it, or some aspects of it I'm a terrorist? So in other words according to your answer i have no freedom of choice and live in a dictatorship. How about this Liberals, Conservatives, Extraterrestials, Insects, what ever you wanna label yourself, shut the ****' up.

Answer 7

no longer helping the combat against islamo-fascism and/or terrorism is comparable to helping it. and all your left-wing semantics can not replace that. yet, in view which you go with for to play that interest, the fewer than statements replicate help for terrorism (and there are a lot greater the place those got here from). face it, the Left Wing hates united states of america of america: "possible desire to assert that Osama bin encumbered and those non-nation-state fighters with religious objective are very resembling those form of atypical revolutionaries that helped to solid off the British crown." Marcy Kaptur- Democratic representative Ohio "he's (Osama bin encumbered) been out in those international locations for some years, development colleges, development roads, development infrastructure, development day-care centers, development well being-care centers, and those particularly everyone seems to be truly grateful. we've not completed that." Patty Murray- Democratic Senator Washington (speech to a extreme college honors type) "it is a racist and imperialist warfare. The warmongers who stole the White residing house have hijacked a rustic's grief and became it right into a perpetual warfare on any non-white united states they decide for to describe as terrorist." Woody Harrelson "they could call Jesus a terrorist too. I mean, he became extraordinarily difficult on funds creditors a time or 2." Ramsey Clark- former Democratic criminal expert typical (throughout a media journey for an anti-warfare team) "This united states of ours has committed the main severe act of aggression in its background by eye-catching in a warfare of aggression with no announcement of warfare by Congress," Ramsey Clark- Former Democratic criminal expert typical "Bin encumbered did no longer come from the precis. He got here from someplace, and in case you seem the place ... you will see united states of america of america's hand of villainy." Harry Belafonte "i did no longer help Operation desolate tract Fox." Janeane Garofalo could desire to we pass on...?

Answer 8

Not all liberals are. It is truly an individual matter which got grouped into one title. There are many, many SICK individuals in this world, and ANYONE, anywhere who could even START to understand the actions of terrorists are SICK, dangerous, and in desperate need of a psychiatrist. So, simply put, they are SICK and DANGEROUS.

Answer 9

The term "Liberal" has been vilified by the Extreme Conservatives -

The real definition is:
ADJECTIVE: 1a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. c. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.

I WOULD RATHER FIT THIS CATEGORY OF PEOPLE

Answer 10

Which Liberals & Which Terrorists?