2006-06-22 23:51:33 · 23 answers · asked by Vendetta 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
bra the short form of brazil.bra la la la la la la bra bra.
2006-06-22 23:55:18 · answer #1 · answered by Aditya K 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Argentina
2006-06-23 00:43:57 · answer #2 · answered by kwame 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Argentina
2006-06-22 23:57:11 · answer #3 · answered by dhananjaya d 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brazil are still the best attacking team but Argentina have a very solid defence. Just look at how they won 6-0 the other day they were awesome going forward but still didn't concede. Most teams that win by that margin often concede at least 1 thru a lake of concentration or interest in a game they are winning easily, not Argentina thou..
2006-06-23 00:19:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Argentina... Brazil didn't play as it used to... and yes, they won too many times... I think Argentina plays better, but I hope an outsider wins the World Cup...
2006-06-24 05:06:24 · answer #5 · answered by Mar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Argentina surely... Brazil team I'm not really sure could get through to the World Cup Final, even playing against Italy
2006-06-23 00:05:41 · answer #6 · answered by moro4orom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well... to give the brazils a break im goin 4 argentina!!!!
2006-06-22 23:57:46 · answer #7 · answered by tkay. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think this year Argentina are very Strong team but If they do not loos their confidence in front of world famous player in Brazilian VS Argentina games
2006-06-23 00:01:45 · answer #8 · answered by behzad43blue 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Argentina. Cant have Brazil winning again it would be boring world cup if they did...
Though i want England to win.
2006-06-23 00:05:49 · answer #9 · answered by ferli 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in the beginning... Argentina was better...
but yesterday against Japan.... Brazil came to the party!!! definitely Brasil!!
2006-06-23 00:18:48 · answer #10 · answered by Vantage 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am for argentina, thats for sure. brazil has won too much in the past. forza argentina!!!
2006-06-22 23:55:14 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋