Clinton? The best? I can't agree with you on that, but I definitely agree with you on Bush. Simply the worst!!
2006-06-22 23:32:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
In terms of domestic policy, I'll agree that Clinton was at the very least a tie for the best (with Roosevelt's New Deal). Can't say anything bad about the sitting President while he's still in office, and NO it's not because I want to wait until he's out, but because of all the "big brother" tactics he's put into place in spying on our own people, the Secret Service will be on me like white on rice.
As for Hillary winning, it will never happen, as long as republicans are in control of Congress. Redistricting done before Bush's (to say the very least) controversial win to ensure their position on the hill will keep the electoral votes in favor of the next republican candidate. I personally think that America is ready for a female president, but most republicans, especially those on Capitol Hill, will make sure that will never happen.
John McCain or Rudy Giuliani?
2006-06-23 07:17:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Compared to Bush, Clinton was the best president, but that's not saying much. While Clinton was a decent president, he was by no means the best, consider former Presidents Lincoln and FDR - in a conversation about best president's these men cannot be ignored. If Hillary actually ran for president her tenure would be judged less practically and more ideologically - she would of course be the first female president, a tremendous accomplishment in itself, and history would remember her as one who broke barriers and changed the course of this country's future.
2006-06-23 09:31:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by leslie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only history will judge who is the worst and best and even then it subjective as well. If 50 years from now the accepted social conditions have stabilized the current society may see Clinton as great or the biggest jerk on earth ditto for Bush. Current feeling and belief systems shadow and tilt the perceptions of current events and can not accurately give "titles" to individuals.
2006-06-23 07:12:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not being born in the US, Sir Edmund Hillery cannot become president.
No doubt this will be a hot topic for discussion during social studies when you get to 7th grade.
2006-06-23 06:24:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bill S 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nixon was worse. Carter was pretty misreable too. I guess in presidents this century Nixon, Bush then Carter, in order of worst to not so bad. By the way Teddy, Eisenhower and FDR were much more bad *** than Clinton, not to mention the Washington, Lincoln, Adams, Jefferson, Madison and the greatest american never to be president Hamilton.
2006-06-23 09:14:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by pattrick5000 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton had questionable morals, at best. And he let Bin Laden walk out of a jail cell in Africa when we knew he was a threat. To say he is the greatest is quite wrong. I also think George Bush is a weak leader, but not the worst. He's a terrible orator and he doesn't have the moral fiber to stand up and fight against those who stand against him.
But, to answer your question, Hillary will NEVER become the president. 2008 is the first year I'm eligible to vote, and it will be against her. She is a witch with a capital B. And she'll have to pry my video games out of my cold, dead hands.
2006-06-23 06:31:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by chris 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Her husband wasn`t that great either. If you dig you will see he is part of the same NWO as the Bush`s. Abe Lincoln, Dwight Eisenhower, and John Kennedy were our true greatest presidents. I have to admire JFK as my very favorite because he was wanting to disband the CIA and return america`s money to america and get out of the Fed Reserve System. He paid with his life for that main fact!
2006-06-23 07:28:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by the_decider 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are right about Clinton and Bush; however, I don't think Hillary will run for President. Sadly, I don't think the nation is ready for a female Pres.
2006-06-23 06:27:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by JZ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton=Giving China and North Korea the ability to hit us with nuclear weapons.Refusing to take Bin Laden into custody after the Cole bombing.Pulling troops from Somalia and encouraging the terrorist movement.
2006-06-23 06:35:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tommy G. 5
·
0⤊
0⤋