If they are aliens, where did they get the man to crew for them? Is this why they have been abducting us? Just to send us back to Earth?
Does this explain why Dick Clark was around for so long?
2006-06-22 21:03:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
My fear is that they land at the White House and determine there are no intelligent life forms on Earth.
2006-06-23 03:09:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by parrotjohn2001 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
FYI: Lifeforms on the third terrestrial world of this star system, centered on the gravity well of a yellow main sequence sun, are primarily based on a water-oxygen-carbohydrate-phosphate (ATP) dependent metabolism and feature genomes composed by dual-helical DeoxyRibonucleicAcids, there are four bases in this local system and the helices generally form their most stable patterns in a left-handed, anti-clockwise rotation that looks forward-slanted from the side (like: \ not /).
While a tiny minority of the single-celled life on this world is capable of sulfur-based metabolism, the overwhelming majority of it is in fact oxygen dependent. The life tends to be classed roughly into three generaly groups: single-celled life (further divided into bacteria, protozoans, paramecia, etc.), immobile and low-activity "planted" life (further divided mainly into photosynthetic plants that create their carbohydrates by specialized mitochondria that convert light, water and carbon dioxide into simple sugars and oxygen, and non-photosynthetic fungi who largely do not), and mobile, high-activity "animal" life (further divided into vertebrates--life with an internal means of support, and invertebrates--life with an external and/or minimal means of physical support).
The predominant signs of life on this world, as detectable from any meaningful distance, and as measured by population (i.e. reproductive success) are, in order of numbers: bacteria, insects, and bipedal, fur-and-milk bearing mammals of a placental and ape-like sort.
Previous science has demonstrated that the bacteria lack the evolved sophistication to grow or otherwise generate the signs of a mediocre civilization that appear to exist on this world. More than a few synthetic objects and barriers of significant size are present and observable that could not have been managed in a reasonable amount of time by single-celled organisms.
This leaves the insect invertebrates and the mammal vertebrates. Both could be candidates for being the local intelligent life and both are problematic....
--the insect life, though on occasion highly organized into eusocial clades and able to create highly nuanced structures, does not seem to be primarily responsible for the pronounced environmental degradations and/or widespread mass-destructive violence that has taken place locally in the past two Modal/Universal Centuries....their social organization is superior but their lack of meaningful size and appropriately scaled tool use sharply indicates they are not the ones ruining the place, nor are they the ones incessantly sending out primitive radio signals that are barely discernable from the *rest* of the pollution created by...
--the vertebrate mammal life, which seems capable of advanced tool use, a mediocre level of social organization, and damned little else. This species, which referes to itself--in a fit of irony perhaps--as the "thoughtful humans" in a long out of use language are neither thoughtful nor humane. Significant doubt exists even amongst the species itself as to whether it is sentient or not...and significant minorities of the populations there seem to be obsessed with cults of herd animals and following vaguely crude, messianic prophecies of apocalypse.....which is horrific in light of their possession of *multiple* technological methods of mass-destruction, many of those methods being employed entirely by accident in the name of "global economic development" whatever *that is*.
Best Advice: Avoid the place until the mammals either die out or submit properly to their insect superiors.
2006-06-23 03:37:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bradley P 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
ah yeah, i directed that mission
2006-06-25 17:59:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋