Hmm
2006-06-22 18:37:39 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
ehehe.. i LOVE watching the bushevik brownshirts squirm and spin. Notice how they do ANYthing except answer the question.
2006-06-22 21:02:40 · update #1
Two lies:
1. I did not have sexual relations with that woman.
2. There are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq
Both lies may be considered pernicious in one sense, but which one killed people? So, I'll say the Bush' mis-statements to start the Iraq war were infinitely more harmful to America's interests as well as the mother's of fallen soldiers than Clinton having his cigar smoken by an intern.
2006-06-22 18:47:24 · answer #1 · answered by inpoetry1 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I guess that ts_flanders doesn't think that Iraqi citizens qualify as people. Yes, there have been 2,500 soldiers killed but that's not counting the people of the country our army invaded.......
Clinton lied and somebody in the Bush administration lied and I think that Bush got duped. The admin. made a pretty convincing argument....
There's a reason why our troops do not count civilian deaths only their own. Minimum: 38,475 Maximum: 42,889
2006-06-23 02:18:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lying about an iraqi threat has already killed 10's of thousands without ne reasons....so if we wan 2 avoid nemore "10's of thousands of death"...we'l jus hav 2 avoid another blow'job from BUSH
2006-06-23 01:43:58 · answer #3 · answered by utter_trance 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton is guilty of both. President Bush was only repeating what Clinton said in 1998-99.
But to answer your question. Neither a BJ, nor a false Iraqi threat have caused 10's of thousands of deaths. To date I think US deaths are somewhere around 2600. Far, far, far, FAR below you question of "10s of thousands".
And yes, there have been civilian and enemy deaths. But no one cares about them. This is a WAR. In war we only care about OUR SIDE! Unless of course you are a flaming lib, then it is a natural tendency to support the enemy.
2006-06-23 02:17:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton got the blow'job
Bush lied about the Iraqi threat
Which has caused the most bloodshed?
2006-06-23 01:43:26 · answer #5 · answered by Ferret 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a question of dignity and respect for the country and the office. There are people out there that want to kill us because of the color of our skin, our political beliefs and our religion. We need to do all we can to wipe these people off the face of the earth. Peace brother.
2006-06-23 01:44:32 · answer #6 · answered by Coach D. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think when we went to war we were looking for the terrorist that put planes in New York buildings and Pentagone.and threatening to use lethal Gas on us...-
Al Quadia which suposed hid in Iraq-But as you guessed It Ran and Hid in a rat Hole.
Who cares Who Lied...!
2006-06-23 01:49:03 · answer #7 · answered by ole_lady_93 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that pretty crazy comparison. have you ever heard of a place called Waco?
how about Bosnia? The lewinski thing was very small event in that mans personal life.
2006-06-23 01:45:29 · answer #8 · answered by dpm 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man, why don't people ever see all the good things Clinton has done like take soda away from schools, give condoms to 13 year olds...or wait, I know...give nuclear power to Iran, because well, we all know they wont use it against us. geeze.
2006-06-23 01:42:39 · answer #9 · answered by MB 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on who you ask. To someone with a brain, lying about Iraq.
2006-06-23 01:40:33 · answer #10 · answered by Rob K 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋