Shouldn't world leaders fight it out themselves and not send innocent people to die?

Question

Notice how leaders and their friends and family smile and joke in public while the military die for a cause they don't even understand or it may even be fabricated?.

Answer 1

Welcome to reality. Soldiers killing each other does not solve any problems.

These people in office don't give a damn about the soldiers dying for their politics, as long as they get re-elected by those dipsh*ts who go to political conventions and act like the peoples' vote actually means something.

Answer 2

Obviously not. You have to take into consideration, ma'am, that not all world leaders are Texans like George Bush. What about leaders like Nelson Mandela and Fidel Castro? They're pretty old to fight. You cant just throw them in a ring against Kim Jong IL, whos apparently more of a robot than human. What about Junichiro Koizumi? I'm sure he wouldnt be willing to exchange his hairdo for a jarhead cut. It would just be too much of a political suicide 'cuz all his famale voters wont for vote him anymore. And what about female leaders: Gloria Arroyo and the Queen of England? One is too short and the other is just too much of an...um...couch potato.
Maybe all those, Afghans, Palestinians and Israelite Generals can fight it all themselves, but some people just want to live in peace and rule over the politics eternally, like Lee Kuan Yew.

Answer 3

The military is one thing. But creating weapons of mass destruction should not be allowed, becuase there are people ou ttheir (terrists) that think killing innocent people who have no say is a good way to do things. Which is wrong.

Thats why we have the war on terror, fight the military thats why they are there, don't go killing innocent people

Answer 4

There are few worse ideas I have heard than this one. It would be funny to watch how quickly countries start choosing their leaders based on their strength.

AND IN THIS CORNER, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FIGHTING FOR THE CAUSE OF PEACE AND JUSTICE... ARNOLD SCHWARTZENAGER.



AND IN THIS CORNER



FIGHTING FOR THE RIGHT TO EAT OUR BABIES, AND TAKE OVER THE UNITED STATES TO SERVE AS HIS PERSONAL CASTLE, THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE, THE HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION OF THE WORLD, WLADAMIR KLITSCHKO.

Then when Arnold loses, we all have to leave. Oh, well. What can we do. Klitschko knocked him our in the third round, so we better go.

Answer 5

To be very cold-blooded and realistic, wars do serve the purpose of reducing the population. In case you haven't noticed, this old ball of mud we live on can only support so many people.

Answer 6

oh yeah thats a good idea- lets give each world leader whose interested a club or gunor knife and just have them go at each other. thats really gonna work. the purpose of being a world leader is not to go kill and dominate other nations. the purpose is being wise enough and intelligent enough to lead ur ppl to prosperity and lead them better through times of hardship. make sure their moral is up. try to make them happy. not going and killing and dominating other ppl.

Answer 7

Excellent point. I don't notice George Bush sending his daughters to Iraq, nor does John Howard send his son.

Answer 8

Only newborn babies are innocent on this planet, and the brave people in Our armed services aren't sent to "die", they are sent to spread the word of freedom to the idiots that think they can rule by killing.

Answer 9

It would be cool but not very realistic. I got a mental image of Bush and Saddam Hussein duking it out in a boxing ring.

Answer 10

Yes.