Possibly the weirdest end-of-the-world scenario yet?

Question

"The Big Crumble" Check on exitmundi.nl for a basic overview.
How is it possible for constants to be...not constant?
Does anyone have more info?

Answer 1

I think the author of the article linked to in your referenced web page (it's the link below) explains it well. One of the many fundamental constants, the Fine Structure Constant, may have changed very slightly -- or it may not have. The data acquired so far is not conclusive, especially as decided by the scientific establishment, which generally demands pretty overwhelming proof of such a radical idea. And as the author says, confirming evidence must be obtained not merely from more iterations of the same experiment, but from totally different kinds of experiment, and he adds that precision in these other experiment types is not yet high enough to be useful as a proof.

Answer 2

Wow, i imagine you may properly be 1/2 thanks to fixing the which technique of existence. save up, the best paintings Aristotle. this idea is likewise explored contained in the Matrix trilogy action pictures, the position human beings were superceded with the help of their robotic creations and are literally being harvested as a countless potential source, hidden from the actual international contained in the Matrix. A fabricated simulation of what the international used to look as if. some even if managed to flee and formed a insurrection antagonistic to the machines. This brings me for your element the position you requested would human beings be taught the cheat codes for this software. If human beings were waiting to administration the code, this would propose an interface exists between the U. S. and this technique, that can therefore propose a conduit wherein to bypass over to the actual international. yet when shall we go over, how would we take position ourselves? the particular idea of the "human being" contained in this technique is fullyyt summary, in reality they might exist as no longer some more thing effective than records values in memory places. you also element out this software simulation as an infinitely executing loop. try this signifies that each and each cycle of the loop is one existence of the universe and that each and anytime the loop executes, a thoroughly distinct universe is born per some parameters given? OR, does this loop haven't any circumstances or parameters and implements the exact same behaviour persistently? And if the latter is actual, then does this propose its plausible to apply the interface to locate precisely what is going to ensue later contained in the loop, or perhaps leap to a distinct element contained in the loop i.e. time go back and forth. Hmmm i ask your self.

Answer 3

There are several theories that allow for the fundamental "constants" to evolve over time, distance, dimensions, densities etc. Obviously they are no longer constants though physicists are notoriously stubborn and will probably continue to call them constants. The most notable theories with changing constants are VSL, or varying speed of light theories, which postulate a faster speed of light in the early universe that is continually slowing down. These are near fringe but not quite fringe theories in cosmology that spread the gambit of explaining away dark energy, dark matter, to attempting to tackle the "theory of everything", as an alternative to brane, and loop theory. Even in brane theory (modern string theory), constants like G change on very small scales.

Should a few of the fundamental constants change even a little bit however the consequences for anything made of atoms, like all the structures in the universe for example, would be in a world of hurt, either collapsing in on themselves, or completely breaking apart and ionizing, in a very short period of time. That site you linked to, while dramatic, had it draw on way to long. It would all be over in an instant, and it wouldn't be puddles, so much as opaque plasma clouds.

Answer 4

After taking some time to read through a couple of the theories, the scenarios aren't to far fetched. Most of them seem to have logic behind them. It's just creative thought. And mainly the site is a summary of many creative ideas already once brought up. This site is merely a summary. I found this site quite entertaining and informative. There seems to be a lot of history and applied science in-bedded in each theory. It is now bookmarked. The end of the world is always an interesting topic of discussion. This site gets my thumbs up.

Answer 5

Omg this was so weird, but still interesting, thanks for the webpage.

In fact they dont tell you why is this happening, it seems like the constants were never constants, they were just modifying themselves so slowly that no one noticed, but they are really moving all the time towards certain point where matter wont be stable anymore.

Very Intersting but still crazy and weird.

Keep Up The Good Questions and Interesting Topics.

Answer 6

The author of the article mentions a time frame of 3,000 billion years. The present age of the universe is 14 billion years. I think something else will get us first, before we have to worry about this problem.

Answer 7

"The Big Crumble" will not happen. There is not enough gravitational pull to pull it together. Sory. The most realistic scenerio is that the black holes will consume all matter untill there is only one black hole left.

Or.. Im Catholic so the birth of the anti-christ is another pretty realisitc scenerio.