Ducks do have an echo, but the frequency of their quacks are so close to the echo frequency that it would sound like there was no echo produced at all.
It has something to do with soundwaves and how close a duck's quack reverberation is to the echo effect.
2006-06-22 15:57:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by icehoundxx 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Anyone who has been on the Internet more than a week has probably received at least one of those annoying lists of "facts": dozens and dozens of items of no real significance that somebody thought would be cool for you to know. It is indeed fortunate that the lists are usually composed of I said, 'Quack' items of no real significance, because many of the entries are of dubious veracity. The purpose of these lists apparently is not to educate the masses (however trivially), but to induce readers into the information age equivalent of a scavenger hunt, sending them scurrying all over the Internet in an attempt to verify the truthfulness of the entries. Ours is one of the virtual doors that gets knocked on quite frequently by these scavengers, and while we're glad to help, our job is never done because anyone can make up lists like these — just invent four or five of the most far-fetched statements you can imagine, and follow them with the phrase "and no one knows why." To wit:
* Ostrich eggs have no yolks, and no one knows why.
* Julius Caesar was left-handed, and no one knows why.
* Banging your head against a solid wall really hurts, and no one knows why.
The winner (so far) of the Most Ludicrous Entry contest is the claim that a duck's quack doesn't echo. Unfortunately, it's also the item we're most frequently asked about. The premise is just silly: a duck's quack (and presumably, of all the sounds known to man, only a duck's quack) has some special sonic property that causes it not to echo. We're not talking about a situation where a landform creates an acoustic shadow (a phenomenon under which even loud sounds can be inaudible to nearby listeners), but the claim that a duck's quack doesn't echo under any conditions.
First of all, how are we to define "a duck's quack"? Different breeds of duck make different sounds, and there are a lot of breeds of duck in the world. And anyone who has spent time around ducks knows that even within the same breed of duck, a male's quack can sound nothing like a female's. (Female mallards, for example, make loud honking sounds, but male mallards produce a much softer, rasping sound.) Do all these varied sounds, without exception, fail to produce an echo?
I could dismiss this one merely from personal experience. Although I grew up in suburbia, much of my youth was spent raising various kinds of domesticated animals, particularly ducks and geese. When those ducks got to quacking, I could most assuredly hear the cacophony of sound as it echoed off the stone walls that surrounded our yard and entered my bedroom window. So could the neighbors a few hundred feet down the street, who frequently called us to complain about the noise. The surprise was not that our ducks' quacks didn't echo, but that they echoed so remarkably well.
2006-06-23 00:58:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This has been researched profusely, and frankly, they don't know. It has something to do with the frequency of the sound.
2006-06-22 22:20:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by chamrajnagar3 2
·
0⤊
0⤋