By our current laws are homosexuals denied any more rights than people who can't express their religious beliefs? I mean if you are a homosexual you can express that in public and even in school. I don't think it's moral. The only thing that you can't do as a homosexual is get married. Marriage isn't an institution of the state. It's an institution of religion. The government, if they truly believe in separation of church and state, should keep their noses out of it altogether. Now a religious person on the other hand is prohibited from speaking about God in her speech as a Valedictorian. Now where is the tolerance? It's a flat out government restriction on the freedom of speech. Back to the marriage thing. If the government is allowed to make laws concerning who can and can't get married, then what is going to stop them from making laws in the future saying that certain hetero couples can't get married? Maybe as a result DNA testing. Do you see the importance of this left and right?
2006-06-22 14:09:48 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
You are arguing BOTH sides of this debate. WTF side are you on?
2006-06-22 14:14:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm not following you entirely well, but I agree with everything you said -- it's the left and right part I'm not clear on. There are HUGE differences between liberals and conservatives, that's why we have checks and balances (personally, I wish the leftists didn't exist, but I guess we really do need them to balance things out). I think I see what you're trying to say, that the lines separating the liberal and conservative agenda are fuzzy, but there will always be disparity. And I really do think that's healthy. It even gave you something to ask about!
2006-06-22 14:19:37 · answer #2 · answered by partlycloudy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leftists are Socialists in the making i.e. redistribution of wealth
Right-leaning people are basically conservative by nature
I agree with the Libertarian mentality: Personal Responsibility and less government involvement
2006-06-22 14:17:05 · answer #3 · answered by Dee Scott 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You don't need two mentally challenged people forming a family unit. They are incapable of having children between them selves. There is no reason for them to be married. I agree marriage in the eye of government is sex tax. and only a sex tax. As much as like seeing two lesbians going at it. It is a substitute for sex. Sex should be be able to impregnate a woman. Two Gay guys can create only one thing between themselves HIV. Children don't need to see this before age 18.
2006-06-22 14:21:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I understand the point that you are trying to make but "leftists" and "right wings" are still two completely different ends on the poilitical spectrum. There are a lot of differences between their political ideology and such.
2006-06-22 14:17:39 · answer #5 · answered by T4Toyin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberals want your money.
Republicans want to control every other aspect of your life, which god you worship, who you sleep with, what you teach your children, etc., etc., etc....
Vote Democrat and get a better accountant.
2006-06-22 14:18:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
listen the only differencr between politicians worldwide is the wiskey they prefer.. jack daniels or black label...
2006-06-22 14:14:48 · answer #7 · answered by The Thinker 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot!
2006-06-22 14:12:42 · answer #8 · answered by Rocky 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋