English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I really would also like to know just how many Clinton 'associates' were murdered or died under 'mysterious' circumstances.
I seem to recall that Rush Limbaugh had a list that was over a 100 names long.

2006-06-22 13:48:06 · 8 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Politics & Government Government

well I must add this, I guess. You could add 100% of the 9/11 victims to Clinton's toll, because he was offered Bin Laden and said he did not want him, So BIn Laden walked out of a (African, I seem to recall) jail cell. This was AFTER the 1st attempt to bring down the WTC.

Military action and the deaths that befall our soldiers are not the subject of this debate. If it were the democrats would really be up a tree, *** all military conflicts prior to granada and desert shield/storm were started (on our side) by democrat presidents!

2006-06-22 14:11:24 · update #1

8 answers

Bill Clinton will go down in history as the president who got himself impeached because he couldn't understand the meaning of "what is is".

Hillary Clinton will go down in history as the yo yo who blew with the wind, yelled a lot, and stood by her man.

Should keep late night comedians going for a while.

2006-06-22 13:56:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 6

Well as we all know Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot! Honestly do you really think that if people under an administration died under mysterious circumstances that republicans after clinton wouldn't have at least looked into the allegations. I mean look at what a big deal they made out of a ********...think about what would happen if he was realistically implicated in anything such as a murder.

2006-06-22 20:55:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bill Clinton was not corrupt - just very stupid! Bill Clinton just didn't know any better. After all any USA President that gets blow jobs from his staff in the White House is really a loser, at best!

2006-06-22 20:53:33 · answer #3 · answered by montanawarm 2 · 0 0

Neither. Over time, history will record him as one of our best ever Presidents. Among other things, our economy was great, he tackled much needed welfare reform, and he addressed a long overdue issue: racism.

Now, although I admire the man, I dislike his personal foibles. His dabbling in the "company ink" is very disdainful to me, as is his lack of personal morals. But, that issue did not keep JFK from being called one of our greatest ever Presidents, and he was far more rakish and notorious than William Jefferson Clinton, in that regard!

2006-06-22 21:15:02 · answer #4 · answered by Ancespiration 3 · 0 0

Neither, actually. How I long for those dear dead days when the whole world didn't hate our guts, when we hadn't outsourced half the entry-level jobs to other countries, when we had an articulate and well-educated president who actually understood global politics and got along well with foreign leaders. Can it be only six years ago? Seems like a lifetime.

2006-06-22 20:55:13 · answer #5 · answered by Steve H 5 · 0 0

Bud, if you take Rush Limbaugh as a valid source of information, you're already lost. How's he doing with that drug addiction?

2006-06-22 21:07:25 · answer #6 · answered by JaGa 2 · 0 0

Perhaps you were thinking of George W. Bush?

2006-06-22 20:53:03 · answer #7 · answered by dylanwalker1 4 · 0 0

get real..corruption has always been in the white house, we are just more aware of it now because of the media.

2006-06-22 20:53:28 · answer #8 · answered by puppyhera 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers