2006-06-22 11:19:17 · 8 answers · asked by Iloveitwhenyoucallmebigpoppa 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Of course naked bodies can be considered art and not porn. If the artist is exploring the beauty of the body, and not the sexual innuendos involved with the naked body, then of course, it's art!
2006-06-22 11:25:10 · answer #1 · answered by hex913 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think a photo of nudity without an act of physical sex would be called art, and one with an act of physical sex would be considered porn. Even if it is of one person touching themselves in a 'private' spot, the main media would consider that porn. I love it all, but I'm going with what is considered.
2006-06-22 18:28:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes a naked woman can be consider art but it upto each person if he/she sees it as art or porn.
But the ones who see it as PORN should not stop others from see the nudes, each person should have the right to make there own decision
2006-06-22 18:26:19 · answer #3 · answered by hitan_2005 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the picture is there only to turn you on, it is porn.
The female form is a very beautiful thing and, if presented right, is true art.
2006-06-22 18:25:46 · answer #4 · answered by John B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lololo...Oooo goodness it is like the song sez " beauty is where u find it..not just where u bump and grind it ' if it is art to u,,who is to say it is not.,,,,unless ur Larry Flint don't worry about it
2006-06-22 18:26:06 · answer #5 · answered by Savannah P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it depends on the circumstance, the posing, the publication and what the picture is mean to convey.
2006-06-22 18:22:31 · answer #6 · answered by DEATH 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it makes you horny, chances are it is more than art that did it.
2006-06-22 18:22:52 · answer #7 · answered by tictickchick 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that nudity is beautiful, although if is done in a nasty way then it is porn. which can be fun too hehe
its just a matter of morals maybe idk lol
2006-06-22 18:23:38 · answer #8 · answered by jenzen25 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋