2006-06-22 09:25:34 · 33 answers · asked by gudrun077 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Rule the world! In your question, I suppose that if I rule, it will be saved! If I could just save it, I do not know if it would run properly and for the benefit of all, with love, pride, justice and high living standards!
2006-06-22 09:43:42 · answer #1 · answered by soubassakis 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Save the world most definatly. Mainly becuase ruling the world is impossible for many reasons also to me I think that there are to many problems in this world to be solved by one person. If you saved the world....well thats the answer in itself. If you didn't save the world then the world would be not saved meaning that whatever bad would happen. Do you know what I mean?
2006-06-29 08:12:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would much rather save it. I'm learning that there is so much I don't know about the world. But I do know that it is worth saving. I would be very happy to leave the ruling of it to He who knows how. Imagination and hope! As long as we have those we have a dream. And I am a bit of a dreamer.
2006-06-23 10:36:20 · answer #3 · answered by AK 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do we live? We all want immortality. Not to live forever, but so that our memory will linger for all eternity.
If I were to rule the world I could fail. I could turn comprimise into chaos. But if I were to save the world I know I have accomplished a great deal. I would be in the history books for a long time as "The one who saved the world".
I think I would chose to have the power of everlasting memories of something I accomplished and not something I could fail at.
2006-06-22 20:49:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is an entry in my high school yearbook, "When you create your own society, I want to be a part of it." People have always viewed me as a little different but I don't think they are always sure why. My grandfather said when I was born he saw something special in me. I have always felt like I am destined for greater things, to make a difference in the world in a significant way. I have always felt like I am an exception to the rules everyone else has to follow. It is a fact that I look at things and think of things differently than most others. My answer is rule.
2006-06-23 17:33:13 · answer #5 · answered by Type3Thinker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I don't think that I would want to rule the world, too much responsibilty and it doesn't come with a benefit or vacation package that I am aware of. If I could save the world I would do that, it sounds like a one time gig and then you would get to be a hero and get all the glory.
2006-06-22 10:24:26 · answer #6 · answered by steph 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather to rule the world first and save the world, MY WAY.
2006-06-22 09:29:36 · answer #7 · answered by almato 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely save the world. but i have the power to do neither, nor does anyone else reading this.
Why would you want to rule the world? Can you imagine the paperwork? And what kind of vacation package could you even get from that? no days off, no perks? why bother.
2006-07-04 19:01:29 · answer #8 · answered by yodasghost1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem is that both are impossible. But you could possibly share an idea with enough people that the idea changes things. But the idea that one person can rule anything larger than a household is one of the problems that we need to solve on the way to saving the world. Oh and please note that the only thing more stupid is anarchy.
2006-06-22 09:44:59 · answer #9 · answered by fact checker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
save the world
2006-07-04 11:12:24 · answer #10 · answered by lendy m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rule the world. Because if your rule it right, you save it too. Hitting two birds with one stone.
2006-06-22 09:32:59 · answer #11 · answered by muncher522 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋