English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

does anyone remember the republicans acting like this when clinton was raping interns and accepting bribes from the chinese when he disgraced the oval office? oh, and by the way....he got IMPEACHED.

2006-06-22 09:22:40 · 10 answers · asked by zoo2626 4 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

Yeah I know whatcha mean, not to mention when Clinton bombed Yugoslavia we didn't have that many Republicans saying it was wrong.

In fact loads of Democrats and Republicans supported the Yugoslavia bombing but loads of the same Democrats that supported that oppose Bush bombing Iraq.

Hello why is it ok for Clinton to bomb and not Bush?

2006-06-22 09:27:17 · answer #1 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 3 2

Wow, truly stupid reasoning from a truly stupid person.

There is no question that Bush should be impeached. To impeach someone is to place them under trial or investigation. However, you must ask yourself, "who makes this decision"? Certainly it is not the voting public; such a decision has never been put to referendum, nor will it. So, when Clinton was impeached, the processes was enacted by the legislature, which was a republican majority. In fact, the entire reason Clinton was impeached was b/c an article came out mentioning "a woman named Paula" (Paula Jones for those of you with a short memory). Later, the author of that article confessed to submitting in solely for "political zeal" (zeal means motivation for anyone dumb enough to 'be a conservative'). It was that article and others like it that prompted the legislature to institute impeachment proceedings.

TRUST ME, if we had a democratic legislature (and, God willing, we will by the end of this year), Bush would be impeached. Its that simple, the man is a crook, and in fact possesses several Nixon like qualities.

Just wait and see, the conservatives day of reckoning will come. Then maybe we all will have a chance.

PS-- I have never read anything more inane than what the idiot above me just wrote. Not one person with a brain thinks that Fox News presents both sides of the issue.

2006-06-22 16:42:59 · answer #2 · answered by pregunta? 2 · 0 0

Actually, liberals are pretty fair and reasonable. Con servers are factually ignorant, and demonstrably more vicious. This is a projection, a reversal of the actual facts. Clinton did not get impeached factually, or he would have been removed from office. And he did not rape anybody, those involved consented.
So there you are, making up lies and vitriol according to ignorant
and vicious republican practice. And calling liberals the vicious and ignorant ones all in the same breathe? how do people like
you sleep at night?

2006-06-22 16:28:34 · answer #3 · answered by kucitizenx 4 · 0 0

He did not get Impeached, he finished his last term as President you silly guy, and you guys had the majority and you still couldn't get rid of him. Don't you think if Dems were in control of the the House and Senate and Supreme Court Bush would be getting Impeached right now, but you would still say that he has not done anything wrong wouldn't you? So don't give me that crap

therandman think fox news is real news, that just about says it all


Maybe the President had more important things to do like run the country then go to court.

How come you only metion fox news as a source that would have anything to do with you being Repulican would it.

I wish no one would call each other names, I feel like I am back in high school.

2006-06-22 16:31:17 · answer #4 · answered by DEEJay 4 · 0 0

They're not so much ignorant and vicious, as they have their standpoint, and we have ours, and just like us at the moment, are unwilling to negotiate. ("Us" being conservatives) There is nothing wrong with either standpoint. This is what makes America great. Or at least what used to make it great. It used to be that you could have a civil argument about politics, and that sometimes there was no winner, and no party was "superior" to another. Now both sides have these "character attacks" and its complete and utter BULLSHIT. If both parties could grow a goddamn brain and try and work together instead of having a giant pissing contest, holy crap, SOMETHING MIGHT GET DONE. But i forget. It's modern America. We can't have that. Someone always has to be on top...and it's destroying the country that I love.

2006-06-22 16:58:28 · answer #5 · answered by airbornefighter101 1 · 0 0

Because they can't win debates because emotion can't trump facts
Because they have lost power in the House & Senate
Because Fox News, Talk Radio, and the intenet allow peolpe to get all sides of an issue
Beacuse the major news networks now have competition
Because poor people are seeing the trap liberals have caught them in
Because Bush now has more coservative judges on the supreme court than liberal judges
Because name calling and character attacks are easier than changing peolpe's minds with debates
Becuase they can't figure out why a Cowboy is smarter than they are
Becuase they don't understand that peolpe can think for themselves and don't need their threats and unfulfilled promises

2006-06-22 16:34:25 · answer #6 · answered by therandman 5 · 0 0

Acting like what exactly? I remember Republicans being quite obstructionist.

And about the impeachment, he was ACQUITTED by a Republican controlled Senate no less.

2006-06-22 16:29:15 · answer #7 · answered by James 7 · 0 0

Wow you have a lot to learn.


Why don't you go suck your thumb rather than only adding to the fire that burns between Libs and Cons?

*Rolls eyes*

2006-06-22 16:27:09 · answer #8 · answered by Kamunyak 5 · 0 0

"Why are liberals so ignorant and vicious?"

Wow. Thats a pretty ignorant and vicious question.

2006-06-22 16:29:03 · answer #9 · answered by skaichic 1 · 0 0

You're right (pun intended) neocons are the epitome of virtue.......LOL!, you're an imbecile!

2006-06-22 17:07:32 · answer #10 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers