English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When do you liberals suppose these weapons became unusable? In the near past or distant past? I hear that this chemical is deadly still today. Does a felon get a pardon for having old bullets in his gun? Do old bullets not kill as well as new bullets? Do you liberals not understand the black and white of illegal weapons and the possession of banned weapons? Is this another grey area for you bleeding heart liberals? Can you not be pleased by progress in the war on terrorism and the removal of deadly weapons getting in the hands of murderers like those who cut off the heads of innocent civilians trying to help rebuild a country and provide a better life for it's citizens? You guys are so blind!

2006-06-22 08:16:30 · 6 answers · asked by AmericanSwede 2 in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

They were already unavailable, forgotten and degraded so that they were no longer deadly. They were from before the first Iraq War and there is no reason to suspect that Saddam even knew of their existence, nevermind the fact that they were degraded and not deadly.

2006-06-22 08:30:46 · answer #1 · answered by James 7 · 2 1

My thoughts are, didn't saddam say there wasn't any chemical weapons at all in his country?......

But really, it only takes a little sarin gas to harm a great deal of people. I guess it all depends on how potent it really was.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060622/pl_afp/usiraqmilitaryweapons_060622191218

Intelligence officials:
"We assess that they are not in condition to be used as DESIGNED. And detailed analysis of the toxic agents shows they are degraded and represent a much LOWER hazard," he said.


I'm not trying to spin the situation, but I think there needs to be more clarity in how potent it was, to know how dangerous it was; and I guess I need to revisit if Saddam said he had absolutely no chemical agents left.

2006-06-22 08:34:42 · answer #2 · answered by Rick 4 · 0 0

TO the guy who said "don't be a friggin moron", you are the moron for holding a grudge for losing two election to Bush. Get over it and live a normal life, Gore lost, Kerry lost and now you are attacking the winner as any sore loser would do. Get a life and get over the past elections, you will be much happier when you do.

2006-06-22 08:26:16 · answer #3 · answered by americanswede1234 1 · 0 1

Well.... I really want to know what happened to the warheads that Saddam used against us in the first Gulf War???!!!! The chemical storm was on then, what did they just disappear, I think not?! Alot of you don't know what the hell you are talking about.

I agree with you AmericanSwede....

2006-06-22 08:28:57 · answer #4 · answered by priorsvcmarine 2 · 0 1

dont be a friggin moron. the weapons are old and even the defense dept said they dont pose a threat.


Typical spin put on to save the sinking ship of this presidency.

2006-06-22 08:19:24 · answer #5 · answered by AaronVipr 1 · 1 0

Wow, somone is a mad little one. This country has gone to he!! in a handbasket the last 7 years.

2006-06-22 08:23:14 · answer #6 · answered by sweettea 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers