2006-06-22 07:34:03 · 15 answers · asked by david c 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Richard Gere
2006-06-22 07:42:12 · answer #1 · answered by coloradosnoflake2 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No - that ought to suck! How about an actor for President? How about the Washington corruption by Hollywood and the media! Hollywood - Cable Networks and the numerous bypass information Media - operating for who? look on the prepare 24 - Jack Bauer - what percentage shows previously that prepare presented torture as a norm? that is all Desensitizing initiatives to sway opinion and/or replace guidelines contained in the minds of human beings. exhibiting them as needed evil's, they couldn't be more effective incorrect! we do not pick to work out that crap and definite, it continues to be incorrect both way. look into Fox information, MSNBC and now even CNN. The biast showmanship occurring is rediculous. They format around the candidate they help and do not provide any actual time or honest play to different applicants. also they're biast contained in the records they provide on Iraq and on Bush/Cheney. absolutely everyone who can positioned on Paris Hilton and the Chris Benoit homicide for a month at the same time as actual existence and death memories of conflict are occurring should be paid to silence the reality. I propose the weekend of seven/7/07 became the bloodiest maximum threatening weekend because the conflict all started and what did they hide? Chris Benoit and steroids Actor's are large liars, next to legal experts i don't believe of absolutely everyone does it more effective positive. So no - i does no longer pick to work out an actor develop into President! Reagan became large, yet save in recommendations the Oliver North and the sale of guns to Iran? There are an recommendations-blowing many stuff we do not comprehend, yet i comprehend this! An actor is going to be no longer some more thing effective than a puppet or speaking device. that is what they income this properly. i elect to work out a genuine American for the yankee human beings contained in the Whitehouse.
2016-11-15 03:10:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
John Travolta pretty much already did in Primary Colors. But Darrell Hammond does a dead on impression of him. If Phil Hartman were alive, it could be him...he had the voice down, too.
2006-06-22 07:44:08 · answer #3 · answered by Carlito Sway 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darrell Hammond
2006-06-22 07:38:04 · answer #4 · answered by B-Dub 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darell Hammond
2006-06-22 07:45:04 · answer #5 · answered by Karbare 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not have ol'Bill play himself? If Al Gore can do it (although he wasn't COMPLETELY convincing playing "Al Gore" in "An Inconvenient Truth") Bill can.
Hillary'll be glad to get him out of the house, and there are plenty of available "interns" in Hollywood to keep him entertained during the filming.
2006-06-22 07:41:05 · answer #6 · answered by DR 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Didn't John Travolta already play him or a character like him in a movie
2006-06-22 07:39:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, John Travolta already played him in "Primary Colors," when he wasn't as popular as he is now. ha
You are so right, though.........Darrell Hammond. Like Will Farrell with Bush, perfect.
2006-06-22 07:47:15 · answer #8 · answered by Nani 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Will Ferrell
2006-06-22 07:37:19 · answer #9 · answered by PhantumBG 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
john travolta
2006-06-22 07:41:49 · answer #10 · answered by Donald J 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋