2006-06-22 07:09:19 · 7 answers · asked by muhammadatharniaz 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities
If you're both, consider yourself very lucky!
2006-06-22 07:12:35 · answer #1 · answered by Lolateeny 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The healthiest is better...u can have all the riches in His Glory with good health and keep you going but riches can't do anything if ur health is already falling down and dying soon.
2006-06-29 01:59:34 · answer #2 · answered by boots 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to say that healthiest is better than richest. Don't get me wrong I'd love to be rich but it's better to die healthy than to die young and rich.
2006-06-22 14:14:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Healthiest. You can't spend money if you're dead. Both both are important in the general formula of life.
Health+Wealth+Love
2006-06-22 14:15:36 · answer #4 · answered by renaissance_man_1981 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's put it this way. I'd rather be poor and alive than as rich as Bill Gates with a terminal illness! Imagine having all that money and knowing that you will be dead in a few days or hours.
2006-06-22 14:14:17 · answer #5 · answered by quatt47 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all the money in the world can't buy your health but your health can buy you time what's more important to you living longer were buying more I'd like to be around a little longer
2006-06-28 23:30:16 · answer #6 · answered by panhandler 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Health is Wealth" so if you're healthy,you're definitely wealthy.If you had all the money in the world but you're in your death bed,what good can that be?
2006-06-22 14:17:03 · answer #7 · answered by ms.confused 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋