English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

skin color has connection with economy look at world black color skin Africa has some poorest countries of world most white color people places are rich like Europe America Japan south Korea Australia new eland etc,and not white and not black color people places like Pakistan India srilanka etc are medium economy places now why color of skin has substantial connection with economy (my view) color of skin is due to temperature sunrays 1more the temperature more the sex/women productivity result more children 2more the temperature more the person tire very quickly result less working power 3 more the temperature more the chance of losing temperament result fighting (see there is lot of civil wars in hot Africa and how cold Europe despite different culture and language between nations is acting with common currency as one nation and different states are united in u.s.a. ) so its color of skin --> temperature -->population+working power+fighting= economy is this true?

2006-06-22 06:14:33 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Economics

susan i said white people area not white people

2006-06-22 06:25:27 · update #1

i am talking about AREA not INDIVIDUAL

2006-06-22 06:32:09 · update #2

i messed up thing i want to say clymate has connection with economy more heat more poverty and vise versa

2006-06-22 06:48:20 · update #3

10 answers

The simple answer is famine. The more complex answer resolves around why when black folks rule over other black folks, they just can't seem to get along. It would appear that famine may contribute to a feeling that if one gets some power, they need to get all the power, at everyone else's expense.

The freshest example is New Orleans after Katrina. There just wasn't a lot of black folks helping other black folks. If a natural disaster happened in the Kentucky hills, would the results have been the same? I dunno, but there's a lot less crowding out there, so it's tough to draw an equal corroallary.

2006-06-22 10:11:52 · answer #1 · answered by Manny 6 · 0 1

I believe it by sight because physically all of the "black" countries are poor..However I do have to give credit to the white people for not spending everything they have on the new Air Jordans, or that daing Escalade! They are modest people that know how to conserve while living comfortably. However, some of the smartest black people are still poor because they are not as physically attractive. If a white man and a black man had the same idea to give a company a great rise and sales, most likely the company would choose the white man.. But who is to say that the black man/woman will never rise? Look at the Hukstebels (or however you spell it)..Sorry if this offends anyone, but I am mulitracial so i don't mind discussing these things..

2006-06-22 06:23:13 · answer #2 · answered by Ms Phil 3 · 0 1

Are you saying that because it is hot in Africa, that is why there are more children born there, you can't work as hard because you tire easily and fight more? And that is why you are poor? Are you serious? If you actually believe that, then there is nothing anyone can say that will help you. Stop looking for excuses and try actually working harder or better yet, move somewhere without famines and droughts and that has good farmland! Blaming poverty on the heat is an outrageous claim for anyone to make!

2006-06-23 20:35:10 · answer #3 · answered by recordproducer 2 · 0 0

I think all you did was find a correlation between what each poor area has in common. Among them as you stated are skin color, climate, and birthrate. However there is no proven cause and effect between these factors and its affect on "richness." Instead you should look into how each poor area's difference in economic policy between rich areas. I see where you might find a pattern between the factors mentioned above and poverty. But a pattern is all they are NOT CAUSE AND AFFECT. Ex. Most NBA players are players of color, are all colored people good at basketball?

2006-06-23 17:53:05 · answer #4 · answered by jameson_liang 3 · 0 0

i believe it through sight because bodily all the "black" international locations are adverse..even if I do ought to provide credit to the white human beings for no longer spending each thing they have on the hot Air Jordans, or that daing Escalade! they're modest those that comprehend a thanks to shelter at the same time as residing very actual. even if, lots of the neatest black each body continues to be adverse because they don't look as bodily proper. If a white guy and a black guy had an same idea to provide a organization an recommendations-blowing upward thrust and sales, maximum in all likelihood the organization would pick the white guy.. yet who's to say that the black guy/lady will in no way upward thrust? look on the Hukstebels (or perhaps if you spell it)..Sorry if this offends absolutely everyone, yet i'm mulitracial so i do not recommendations discussing this stuff..

2016-11-15 03:06:31 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Is this a question? Try rephrasing it as a complete sentence with an actual question! I'm good at overlooking bad grammar and misspellings, but this isn't even close to being a readable question.
I see big words..white people and richness and one question...is this true? So that's all I have to go by until you learn English grammar.
white=rich=true?=No. Most white people are working class. The next highest group of white people are poor. Then middle class. Then rich.
Most rich people in the world are Asian because most people in the world are asian.

2006-06-25 12:08:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

interesting, but of course it is not the color of the skin but the climate and the skin color is just another unrelated veriable. I've also noticed that northern parts of large countries like US and China are wealthier and more educated. I assumed it had a relation to farming in the south and industry being in the north.

2006-06-22 06:29:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, I'm white, well educated, in the most prosperous country in the world, had every "advantage" (except good health), And am poor. It is the individual, their drive, determination, and being under an economic system that lets you excel rather than punishing you, that leads to wealth.

2006-06-22 06:21:05 · answer #8 · answered by RTD 2 · 1 0

I am white with a strong work ethic and I am poor.

2006-06-22 06:17:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is not skin color.. it is Politics...

2006-06-28 00:48:25 · answer #10 · answered by ♥Tom♥ 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers