Yes, they should be stuck in jail for life.
2006-06-22 06:03:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by flame_alchemist 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I fully agree that convicted child molesters over the age of 18 should be jailed for life. Right now, we put them in jail for a short amount of time, knowing it has the highest rate of recidivism of any crime. Then, we tell them they have to contribute to society, but they have to tell everyone they're a "sex offender" and as a result can't get a job or contribute. It's double jeopardy. In no way am I defending child molesters (see above statement).
The simple fact of the matter is that few child molesters can be rehabilitated. Thus, why take the risk of setting them free, and why send them out in the world telling them to care for themselves while completely hamstringing them.
2006-07-05 11:21:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by WBrian_28 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok, there is not any thank you to rehabilitate maximum of them. they are extraordinarily a lot "complicated under pressure out" to choose childrens. attempting to alter which would be like attempting to alter a heterosexual guy right into a gay guy, or vice versa. perhaps the only way is this: take them to a optimum secure practices reformatory and permit the lonely inmates scare the hell out of them. i'm particular none of them might savor being Rashid's female pal du jour. yet another approach is this, and it may additionally help the sufferers: permit the youngsters who've already been victimized confront those human beings. for a lot of those infants, the emotional trauma has been super, and the pedophiles in all hazard do no longer comprehend the super harm they are doing. they could desire to tie the pedophile to a chair, and permit the youngsters suitable somewhat retribution, as long because it is no longer violent. Even somebody who has a good desire to take indecent liberties with infants could be waiting to summon the interior potential to refrain from such interest after being confronted by the variety of toddlers he might victimize. a lot of them are very offended, and that i think of it would scare those pervs, and perhaps cause them to too ashamed to ever do it back.
2016-12-08 11:31:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually I am leaning towards Bubbles down there, either they are given life, or if they are released, they get a chip implanted for tracking, and to use her phrase "have their tallywacker cut off".
For Timmmay!, you have obviously seen a few of these teachers, and a couple of them were hot. If you were in the same circumstance, how much of a victim would you have felt?
2006-07-01 14:32:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by tm_tech32 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah I agree.....the three strikes law is like telling a predator that they can ruin three peoples lives for the price of one. Its not fair to the victims and their families.
2006-06-22 06:07:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by bunnicula 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I absolutely agree... Under one condition... Women sex crimes included and justfully prosecuted... Life. As it shouldn't matter the gender of the perpetrator. But then Im enfringing on women's rights now aren't I....
Lafave
Mrs. Crompson
23 female school teachers in Kansas (can't name them all)
Letourno -- 9 cases of raping an innocent child (I think thats how you spell it)
Cordue --20 counts of sodomy to an innocent child
and many more...
All of these women received less than a slap on hand... They were dismissed. Only a handfull were charged with contributing alcohol to a minor. Only a smaller handfull received a lesser charge of alcohol and ellicit drug contribution to a minor.
I have all the facts care to question me? Oh, please do.
2006-06-22 20:56:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Timmmay! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think that's right at all.....I think they are just as sick as you do, but they have a serious problem and need help for it.....I think there should be a community that these people can go to and live in and get help, but make sure its far away from any other neighborhood or school.......sticking them in prison for life with murderers does nothing......or maybe just cut there penis off......that would be another good idea.....never get an erection again......but sticking them in prison for life is kind of harsh......these are people with sick fantasies.....and don't understand that what they are doing is wrong....I'm sorry but i cant help but feel sorry for them.......Of course i feel sorry for the victims....these poor kids will be screwed up for the rest of there life's, but prison for life.....i don't agree.
2006-06-22 06:27:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by 1981 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the law stinks in the uk i can tell you any crime to do with a child should be dealt with hard stick em all in the shu i say no sunshine no outside life nothing
give em hell i say
just sickens me the way these child molesters get away with easy time locked up
plus i think thay should cut of there sacks
2006-06-22 06:15:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by sharon B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try Castration. With a tattoo in a conspicious place that identifies them as a molester (forearm or something) that way doctors wont prescribe them hormones. We need really STRONG penalties for molesting and no parole
2006-07-05 16:14:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by eddie9551 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
put them in prison for life because while in prison for a short time they meet other child molestors and bragg what they have done and seem to come out worst .keep them in prison with the inmates what are there for small crimes and they can get abused every day for the rest of there lives like the children who have suffered.
2006-06-22 06:08:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the molesters should be put in jail for the rest of their lives and have their tallywacker cut off. Molesters are sick and disgusting and I have no sympathy for any of them.
2006-06-22 06:04:43
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋