If Bush did not lie about WMD's will people that publically called him a liar, pubically apologize?

Question

before you answer that question look at this site:

http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/Scan001.pdf

Answer 1

Liberals will never publicly apologize to Bush....
And I don't think he lied...maybe he was misinformed, but the news yesterday changes things....

And...have you seen the new conspiracy theories circulating??? Now that some WMDs have been found....Bush planted them there.....
That's right, I think I saw him in the middle of the night...out there with a shovel.....

Answer 2

When you can post evidence that Saddam was ACTIVELY PURSUING nuclear and chemical/biological weapons, as Bush, Cheney, and Powell all stated, I will apologize. Everyone knows he had them pre-1991. As to the news report about 500 weapons found since 2003:

Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.

"This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war."

This comes from FOX news and the Pentagon. We went to war because the "threat was imminent", but have yet to find this "imminent threat" over 3 years later.

I'll apologize when I have something to apologize for. But, so far, I don't.

Answer 3

Oh you saw it on C-SPAn, did you? Well, then - you're the authority on weapons of mass destruction! They should have called you!

It's not politically in anyone's best interest to apologize OR to support the president. But it's obvious, isn't it?

If Saddam didn't have chemical weapons, then what did he gas his people with? Toothpaste? And he said MANY TIMES before the war that he hadn't destroyed a thing, and that he wasn't going to destroy a thing. IF we've found these weapons, then it proves that weapons were there. It proves that the weapons were not destroyed, like Saddam said. And it proves that they were hidden, because inspectors never found them.

Where are you people getting your facts? From John Kerry? Ted Kennedy? Maybe Hillary Clinton?

For example, there are four categories of WMD, right? And does anyone remember when traces of nerve agent were found in Baghdad? I was about 50 miles north of there at the time and I heard about it, but no one here at home did. And one of the other categories is long-range missiles capable of delivering NBC warheads - these were found ALL OVER Iraq.

But still all I hear back home in the US is that "Bush lied." Well you don't have to listen to me, but I'll say it anyway (again): IF you want to bash my country, my military and my president, then you should at least get your facts straight first.

Answer 4

Let's see....

500 tons of Anthrax
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Mobile Weapons Labs
Nuclear fissile material from Niger
Saddam training al-Qaeda how to use chemicals
Tubes only for use in Nuclear bombs

You know I could go on and on about the specifics that were stated before the war.


You think 15 year old useless weapons are his out.....
Are you crazy???

Answer 5

No. They will (and already are)making excuses about the quality and age of the WMD's that were found. Regardless of the fact that they DO EXIST despite Saddam's constant pleadings that he destroyed ALL of his WMD's.

Answer 6

1)Bush did not lie.
Records show the CIA had info that they are they & as of TODAY they have confirmed it.
2) Are you kidding those "GUYS" would never do something as gracious & smart as to admitting they are wrong. Only decent caring people act like that.

Answer 7

No they won't because they have no morals anyway; therefore, they would never admit to being wrong.Liberals are wrong about everything, and totally disgusting individuals. They are not smart enough to even want to hear the truth.

Answer 8

No, they will never apologize. It just isn't the liberal way because that would mean they would have to admit they were wrong. This is a big no no in liberal land.

And to the answer above mine...that's freaking funny.

Answer 9

He DID lie, as did the rest of his administration - saw it on C-SPAN so no thanks to your little website. So no apology there. He's had so many other screw-ups (gas, economy, Katrina, Guantanamo), I seriously doubt anyone for the remainder of this earth will ever apologize to him. Plus, he's NEVER apologized for anything (not even, his 'bring it on' remark or the 'mission accomplished BS') so why should we ever consider apologizing to him?

Answer 10

Of course not they will just shift the arguement to the new DNC talking point and try to hammer that lie until it gets popular belief.