Just wonderng about it - I mean, there's different perspectives; religious, scientific, etc.
2006-06-22 02:27:57 · 12 answers · asked by Pulse 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
People distinguish that based upon their preferences. Yes its should be meat cause it is flesh of a living or dead organism.
2006-06-22 02:35:36 · answer #1 · answered by hrsd 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If it is alive, or has been at one time it is meat. Look at crab meat. Their meat is different from pork, beef, and chicken. But it is still considered "meat" because they are living things.
2006-06-22 02:35:09 · answer #2 · answered by Snow 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is animal flesh just like chicken and beef and other animals. So I would consider it a meat.
2006-06-22 02:31:28 · answer #3 · answered by courage 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many say it’s not, but I do consider it meat, as fish are animal. They move.
2006-06-22 02:42:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would just because it is catigorized but i would consider it being eatable by a vegetarian because it's a different type of meat other than pork or beef.
2006-06-22 02:34:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are pescovegetarians who eat fish only so it is debatable however it is categrized as a meat.
2006-06-22 02:31:02 · answer #6 · answered by xx_muggles_xx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's a meat, just like , beef, pork, chicken
2006-06-22 02:32:15 · answer #7 · answered by Pobept 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is from a living creature, yes it is meat.
2006-06-22 02:34:09 · answer #8 · answered by Sheila 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to Jewish dietary law, it is not a meat.
2006-06-22 02:30:17 · answer #9 · answered by rosends 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and no if you are an vegetarian than no if not than yes.
2006-06-22 02:30:50 · answer #10 · answered by Samantha S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋