Not quite: To have unity you need diversity to be moral.
We need to be one planet with the wide variety of cultures and ethnicity working together as one... This will help to bring out the goodness of human character and action.
2006-06-22 02:05:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by sakura4eternity 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It very much depends on what you mean by everything.
If you really mean everything then no. Many horrible things can cause unity such as war but that does not make it moral.
And diversity is not immoral. Some differences if blended with acceptance strengthen a group rather than split it up. Consider this have you ever visited an area during a festival where many cultures came together to celebrate a common event but each group prepared food that was specific to their culture? If not then look for such an event. You will see unity over the common event that brought them together and then you will see wonderful things related to the diversity of the foods, art works and culture making each different and unique but good and moral in it's own right.
Now if what you are trying to ask is do I believe that things that bring people together are moral and things that drive people apart are immoral. Then I would answer with a qualified yes. In general things that bring people together are good and things that drive them apart are not but even in general terms sometimes seperation is needed.
2006-06-22 02:14:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by John 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Moral has nothing to do with unity. Moral imply to make" unity" out of its conditions.Any effort to "do" unity makes created unity highly conditional, filled with laws and regulation.That "unity " is a great example of our today living in society. Prison is another example...Structure of unity which was offered here is only way humanity know, or wants to know, and always subject to collapse, just matter of time. Unity which we are craving for is unconditional, it is a" happening". Best example is when one fell in love...There is not any doing involved,For a single moment two become one, united...it is happening, beautiful one.Notice one non-conditional condition here, it is absence of moral between two.I did not said it is immoral . I've said absence , imply absence both, moral and immoral, thus, morality. Think.
2006-06-22 03:09:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Oleg B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. forcing everybody to have one culture would be an example of "making for unity" but would be highly immoral. Allowing other nations to exist peacefully without attempting world domination would lead to diversity, but would be preferable to "unifying" the world under one empire.
2006-06-22 04:33:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by student_of_life 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In this superficial realm of consciousness---yes
but in the deeper level everything is already united,we just need to wake up to the truth
just like the table,chair,couch all are unique but r made of the same wood ..so..it kinda makes all this act of uniting as umm.. fakery
2006-06-22 02:20:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Aks 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2006-06-22 02:00:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by sa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes,i agree with you because unity is a power of god.and you know threw the unity we get every things
2006-06-22 02:03:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by saniya 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES,Definitely.
2006-06-22 02:04:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by zenny 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope.
diversity breeds diffrence creating culture
unity breeds sterility
2006-06-22 02:16:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Caus 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree, and i understand the question but i would like for you to explain it better
2006-06-22 02:01:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by free 2
·
0⤊
0⤋