Check out http:timebones.blogspot.com
hf = E (energy)
hf = mk (mass kinetic energy)
hf = c (physical value of time/gravity)
Should you have an interest, were you to go to "archives) I think the month of October, there is a writing entitled "The Formation and Collapse of a Gravitational Field". If that work is correct, then it gives evidence to the above also being correct.
2006-06-22 09:43:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
the information superhighway website decrease than provides a extraordinarily good clarification, commencing with the backside potential (lowest frequency) waves and working as much as the better potential ones. basically seem on the order they record the words in in this wisdom superhighway internet site, to work out which order to place your instructor's record in. while you're perplexed by the version between frequency and wavelength, frequency basically ability how many times is there a top interior the wave. In extreme frequency waves, the peaks are closer at the same time than in low frequency waves. Wavelength basically ability how a techniques distance-clever is it between the peaks in a wave. the better the frequency, the closer at the same time the peaks are, which ability the wavelength gets shorter because of the fact the frequency is going up.
2016-12-08 11:27:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Generally the power carried by a wave (energy per sec) is proportional to (frequency * amplitude) ^ 2.
For quantum particles the energy is proportional to h/lamba where lambda is the de Broglie wavelength. For light this means each photon carries energy hf, and there is no amplitude involved.
2006-06-22 02:10:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Epidavros 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If n is the frequency of an electro magnetic wave then the energy of photon is given by hn. where h is the Planck's constant
2006-06-22 01:10:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pearlsawme 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
E = h v
where E is the energy, h is the constant of Plank and v is the frequency.
2006-06-22 01:10:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by quim_ba 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
E=h.f has it was refered to a EM wave frequency
2006-06-22 01:42:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-06-22 01:10:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Raksha F 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-06-22 01:09:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by ashok reddy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋