English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't know about our relations with ALL countries in the world but I DO know that we've had issues about North Korea forever. I also understand that they are a definite threat and have been a threat. Why oh why did we go after Saddam Hussein rather than P.............. (I don't know how he spells it - you know who I mean). Why are we allowing THEIR country to suffer? Maybe I am just ignorant and if so, I appreciate your input if you are knowledgeable on this subject. I realize I'm going to get bashed here and that's ok by me - don't care. I just really want to know. How do you feel about this?

2006-06-22 00:50:22 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

4 answers

There are only two reasons why George Bush invaded Iraq, a sovereign nation that did not attack or provoke the USA: 1) Bush wanted to 'get even' with Saddam Hussein for humiliating his daddy during Desert Storm; and 2) Dick Cheney wants all the oil swimming under Iraq's sands so he and his Halliburton buddies can get richer and richer and richer.

The United States WILL NOT WITHDRAW ALL ITS TROOPS FROM IRAQ UNTIL DICK CHENEY HAS A ROCK-SOLID, IRON-CLAD DEAL IN PLACE TO ACQUIRE ALL OF IRAQ'S OIL. And that's why we're in the middle of a illegal and unconstitutional war with Iraq, which is putting this country trillions of dollars in debt, and which is ruining our reputation as a global leader.

It's all about greed, power, petty little jealousies, and OIL. The U.S. knows that China's appetite for oil is getting bigger every day. It has no intention of allowing Iraq's oil to go to China.

We tolerate other despots around the world - in fact, there are several dictatorship regimes which we actually prop up with financial aid and let the genocide continue. Why? Because those countries have no OIL.

George Bush, Dick Cheney, and Don Rumsfeld are the most evil, corrupt, incompetent megolomaniacs ever to occupy the Oval Office. This current U.S. Congress is the most evil, corrupt, incompetent body ever to occupy the Capitol Building. All of them deserve to be impeached or tried for high treason. If convicted, they all must face a public firing squad.

Bush is nothing more than a spoiled rich kid who never had to assume responsibility for any actions he's ever taken in life. He was kept out of harm's way while pretending to serve in a military guard unit. His daddy covered up countless DWIs and other legal jams his drug-using, alcohol-abusing son go into; and Bush has never had a job where he's really had to do any physical labor. His life has been one of privilege and power; he has always been isolated from the poor, sick, disabled, or disadvantaged. That's why is has such disdain for most of America's "common" people.

His claims of being a "born-again" Christian are bogus. Have you ever seen him walking out of a church on Sunday morning with his family?

Surely Satan has reserved a special oil-saturated corner of Hell for Bush and all his cronies, where they can spend their eternal damnation blaming each other for the mess they made of this country in eight short years.

Next on the Bush agenda: Iran (it, too, has gobs of OIL). We'll find some flimsy excuse why we need to invade Iran (maybe we'll be searching for weapons of mass destruction again).

And, if 'war' escalates right prior to the next national election, George Bush will impose martial law, postponing the elections until peace has been restored. That will make him America's first King George. The avarice, arrogance, and hypocrisy of this Republican-led band of modern day Robin Hoods (who rob the poor and give it all to their rich friends) is unspeakable.

Sadly, even if we could throw them all out of office, we'd only be replacing them with another band of crooked Democractic politicians. The only solution is another American Revolution.

Check out the newest blog: BUSHWACKER!
www.blogger.com
http://al-aback.blogspot.com

Thomas Jefferson once said: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." That time is way overdue.

But, if our government can keep us distracted with maxxed-out credit cards, Britney Spears' new baby, and buying all kinds of junk we don't need at WalMart for "low prices - everyday" it can continue to play its great American shell game and keep up the shameful scam it has perpetrated on this country for more than five decades now.

2006-06-22 02:33:43 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0 1

#1-A free Iraq will make the Muslim extremist way of life impossible.
#2- Intelligence has approximated Irans timetable to proliferate nuclear weapons for decades.
#3-With Afghanistan on Irans eastern border and Iraq on Irans western border our timetable to keep Iran from becoming North Korea is right on time.
#4-China is on the edge of an economic boom of the likes this world has never seen. It is in they're economic interest to be the leader in dealing with the North Korean situation. China along with the UN and a meek role on the part of the US and Japan will handle them.
#5- With Iran virtually surrounded it will enable enforcement of heavy sanctions upon them by the UN. After surgical air strikes and the toll of heavy sanctions the Iranian government will fall from within at the hands of its own people and military.

2006-06-22 08:17:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

China has a rein on Korea and its politics. If we were to invade Korea we would have had to deal with the Chinese, and the country's huge military. It would have provoked the Chinese, and it would have been an ugly episode ending in a bloody, nasty war. Right now, the US is talking to the Chinese to curb North Korea desires for powerful weapons of destruction. The Chinese are listening because they want its economy to still grow by leaps and bounds, as it has been for the last 10 years. Also we are in debt to China for billions of dollars.

2006-06-22 08:01:47 · answer #3 · answered by mac 7 · 0 0

a) it was *thought* that iraq would be *easy*... NK would be a *real* war against a *real* army
b) n korea doesn't have anything we want, i.e. *oil*
c) we can't afford to piss off china... they own us these days
d) if we get rid of too many *real* threats, the military-industrial complex would not be happy

2006-06-22 07:58:09 · answer #4 · answered by Matthew C 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers