Why do ppl say there was no WMD"s?

Question

Everyone knew he had them. He shot missles at Israel, used chemical weapons on his own ppl. It doesnt surprise me that we havent found them cuz iraq is the size of cali. i could easily hide a chemical weapon the size of a computer and it would be unlikely if it was found. face it we all know he had them the weird thing is why ppl all of a sudden say he never had them even after we found mustard gas and seraphin gas in iraq during the war.

Answer 1

Your funny....i will laugh...........wait for it..........NOW......HAHAHAHA.


There is no point in name calling, i just want you to stop spreading lies told to you, I want you to research better of course...you deserve better.


'WASHINGTON - In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313/...


WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. inspectors have ended their search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in recent weeks, a U.S. intelligence official told CNN.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/us/01/12/wmd.sea...


UNITED NATIONS — A report from U.N. weapons inspectors to be released today says they now believe there were no weapons of mass destruction of any significance in Iraq after 1994, according to two U.N. diplomats who have seen the document

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/...

No weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq by the group looking for them, according to a Bush administration source who has spoken to the BBC.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/polit...


Four months after Charles A. Duelfer, who led the weapons hunt in 2004, submitted an interim report to Congress that contradicted nearly every prewar assertion about Iraq made by top Bush administration officials, a senior intelligence official said the findings will stand as the ISG's final conclusions and will be published this spring.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/art...


AND AS A JOKE>>>>>>>
WASHINGTON — The chief U.S. arms inspector in Iraq has found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction (search) production by Saddam Hussein's (search) regime after 1991.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,1346...

Look i support goal of a stable democracy in Iraq, I sure as hell want the troops safe, but this adminstration lied, and sacrificed or troops for that lie. It is time for competent leadership.

Answer 2

Third time tonight. The weapons they found were non operational. They had traces of gas in the but they were dated pre gulf war 1 and therefore harmless. As a result they could not be considered WMDs. Even your defence deoartment said so "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war."

This was just a report jumped on and distorted by a couple of repblican senators.

Answer 3

I'm guessing many on the left are in denial and those on the right are seeking to somehow legitimize the Iraq war. In both cases, it's a futile effort. Even if you only use the UN's accounting of Gulf War era WMD statistics, Iraq was in contravention of Res. 1441....liberals are wrong on this point and WMD doesn't mean just nuclear devices or some sprawling underground bunker filled with sarin gas tipped ballistic missiles. Conversely, those on the right can't point to a few dozen Iran/Iraq War era chemical shells and call it proof of WMD. While I'm aware that far more materials have been discovered, you're not going to convince your run-of-the-mill moonbat liberal that this constitutes 'proof'....neither will this give those on the right a club in which to beat liberals and the mainstream media with.

Answer 4

There were no weapons tats why they say so.
If there was,why the even the US who claimed tat there was wmd couldnt find it out.

They could find out Saddam why didnt they find wmds.
Saddam would have definitely given more importance in hiding himself stiil he was found so if at all there were wmds tat would have been found even more easily.

No one had said there is wmds in Iraq before.Its only Bush who said so.The UN suspected so cos the Iraqis were not letting them 2 search.

Now even Bush admits he didnt have any solid proof tat there was wmds in Iraq.


I have even heard that it was US itslef that first introduced the Iraqis to WMD a decade or 2 back to be used against Iran.
And Collin Powell is also involved in those deals if I remember right.

Answer 5

To build WMD takes years. It's a sophisticated, science. You have to break down the uranium to create isotopes and radioactivity to creat chain reactions. That's why it took Iran so long to develop a little bit of nuclear power. Yet they are still far from developing nuclear capable weapons because the process is ardous. It looks a lot easier on TV but in real life, it takes time and well equiped labs.

Answer 6

The UN inspectors found absolutely nothing in Iraq before it was attacked.And I think it's a little strange that the weapons were found after so long time and now that Bush's popularity is really,really low.

Answer 7

some people do make a residing getting up infront of strangers men and getting the attention. so they may be doing it for the money, good? yet how did they get there? Its component of who persons are. in case you're taking it heavily and channel the capacity, and make it into an artwork variety, they could replace into some thing extra. a great actor, Oliver Reed began interest in seek of interior the army, call a sought after magician, they are certain to have shown off while they have been youthful and what approximately Evil Knievel? i think of that interest and exhibiting off are 2 seperate issues. once you have executed a sturdy pastime or you're remarkable, the sensation of nailing what ever it truly is you're doing is one in all those rush, it makes you experience alive.

Answer 8

Turn on Fox News !!
Over 500 cashes of WMD's have been found since 2003,but the Gov. kept quiet about it.
Why,I don't know.
Maybe they didn't want the liberal press telling the terrorists where to find them.
HEADLINE: U.S. TROOPS NERVE GASSED IN IRAQ!!!
Boy ,would that sell newspapers!

Answer 9

Saddam had a lot of chemical weapons and used them against Iranian civilians in "Sardasht" and Iraqis civilians in "Halabja". Both of them are cities and they bombed by Saddam's army.

In Iran we had / have a lot of chemical wounded soldiers and civilians, some of them are alive yet. There are a lot of evidence including, documentary movies, documents, chemical samples that UN collected them during the Iran-Iraq war, etc.

Uses of WMDs by Iraq:
Haij Umran Mustard August 1983 fewer than 100 Iranian/Kurdish
Panjwin Mustard October-November 1983 3,000 Iranian/Kurdish
Majnoon Island Mustard February-March 1984 2,500 Iranians
al-Basrah Tabun March 1984 50-100 Iranians
Hawizah Marsh Mustard & Tabun March 1985 3,000 Iranians
al-Faw Mustard & Tabun February 1986 8,000 to 10,000 Iranians
Um ar-Rasas Mustard December 1986 1,000s Iranians
al-Basrah Mustard & Tabun April 1987 5,000 Iranians
Sardasht (The first city with civilians that was hit by chemical weapon during Iran-Iraq war by Saddam) Mustard June 28 1987 500 Iranian Kurdish civilians
Sumar/Mehran Mustard & nerve agent October 1987 3,000 Iranians
Halabjah (The Second city with civilians that was hit by chemical weapon during Iran-Iraq war by Saddam) Mustard & nerve agent March 15-19 1988 1,000s Iraqis Kurdish/Iranian
al-Faw Mustard & nerve agent April 1988 1,000s Iranians
Fish Lake Mustard & nerve agent May 1988 100s or 1,000s Iranians
Majnoon Islands Mustard & nerve agent June 1988 100s or 1,000s Iranians
South-central border Mustard & nerve agent July 1988 100s or 1,000s Iranians
al-Najaf - Karbala area Nerve agent & CS March 1991 Iraqi civilians (Shi’a) casualties not known

According to reports from the previous U.N. inspection agency, UNSCOM, Iraq produced 600 metric tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, VX and sarin, and nearly 25,000 rockets and 15,000 artillery shells, with chemical agents, that are still unaccounted for. In fact, in 1995, Iraq told the United Nations that it had produced at least 30,000 liters of biological agents, including anthrax and other toxins it could put on missiles.

But,
> Who did offer chemical weapons to "Saddam Hussein" regime?
I can say you, US and some western countries like Germany and Netherland. According to fact-files and those courts that was like theatre in Germany.
Germans show people some ridiculous theatre in the court and then they forget all of their guilties.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction


> Why any countries didn't protest to "Saddam Hussein" regime during the war?
Because they wanted to destroying Iran and killing Iraqis protesters, including Kurds, Shias and other protesters. Also "Saddam Hussain" was their close friend.

Also, you don't know why they couldn't find any WMD's.

This is clear, just find news and medias during the first Persian Gulf war (About 1990 - 1991).
Saddam Hussein destroyed all of WMD's under United Nations inspects, because he was worry about allied invading and US knew this fact completely.

US invaded Iraq for Oil, Gas and control over strategic places like Persian Gulf, where a lot of oil producers are there.
The war against terrorist was / is a nonsense excuse.

Be wise, US is supported / supporting some terrorist regimes continuously. For US politicians, this is important that other countries to be US followers, otherwise they are enemies, terrorists, etc.
Actually, The world could be better place if some bully countries including US tried to be honest and they respected to international rules.

Answer 10

Now I am convinced you need treatment. You are the type of person who would argue black is white if your president said so.
Think for yourself.