Who is the most likely to be the next Hitler, he doesn't have to kill Jews again, but anything and destroy.
2006-06-21 23:23:26 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush is already the new mass murder
Bush lied thousands died
2006-06-21 23:27:04 · answer #1 · answered by Red Sawx ® 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How utterly unoriginal to say that GW is the next Hitler. It shows you put absolutely no thought into the question or your answer.
I think it's a toss up between the treasure troll in N Korea and the freak in Iran. In fact, considering what he has said about the Jews and the rest of the non Muslim world, I'd have to say my vote goes to the guy in Iran. Hitler believed that the Aryan race was the only perfect race and all others-the Jews particulairly-were a threat, a waste of space, a nuisance. The treasure troll in North Korea is merely insane, Iran guy is insane with a narrow target of hatred. No Korea dude just wants money from the world-he is holding us all for ransom. Iran guy is out for blood.
Just my .02's worth.
BTW Robert...Hitler was an "elected official" (in German terms of those times) at the time he took over power in Germany. Having a free society doesn't really exclude a nation from the running in this category.
2006-06-22 00:06:14 · answer #2 · answered by kelly24592 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's difficult to tell, look around and in the news etc and see if you can see a Politician/Leader who inspires his country to think they are always correct and everyone else is out of step. Then he secretly stores and builds weapons to destroy others,
Apart from one or two petty dictators in Africa and South America at this time their are three possible countries...........
America
Iran
North Korea
China
Now the next clause they do not have Democratic Elections, ok that's America out and possibly Iran (unless he changes the rules again)
Deductions...............Some powerful state that no one tells you are wrong but is not in step with the rest of the world.
We have two possibilities???????????
2006-06-21 23:37:27 · answer #3 · answered by Robert B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Walker Bush
2006-06-21 23:29:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you are talking about the threat of the nations, I have a feeling that it`s not going to be just one person anymore.
It will be a group of people or some capitalist or militarist organisation , so that sudden death of one of them wont harm their agendas.
Globalisation is almost like made for that kind of threat to happen. So many countries where to hide and operate fluently anything and anyone.
2006-06-21 23:30:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alistar Crane
2006-06-21 23:49:22 · answer #6 · answered by paula_0088 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Erick Cartman
2006-06-21 23:35:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That Guy From South Korea
2006-06-21 23:26:49 · answer #8 · answered by imhungry1989 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hilary Clinton.
2006-06-22 00:32:59 · answer #9 · answered by irishharpist 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
George W. Bush.
2006-06-22 01:26:06 · answer #10 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋