English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-21 20:42:07 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Glad you all agree. I agree that the 6-party format is best. That way we have China's essential and powerful mediating influence AND the pleasure of rubbing North Korea's failed status in it's own (and it's ally China's!) face. Naughty but nice!!

2006-06-22 13:20:23 · update #1

5 answers

Probably because they wouldn't want to lose face in multi-national talks. Maybe

2006-06-21 20:45:54 · answer #1 · answered by Armando 3 · 1 0

It's kind of ironic isn't it?-Dear Leader pretends to be anti-American, but he'd just love to do lunch with GWB. I think the US has the correct stance on this. The six party format is the way to go as Japan, South Korea and China have as much right (or more!) as the US to be concerned about North Korea.

2006-06-22 04:04:32 · answer #2 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0 0

Making any deal with the six party negotiators limits N Koreas ability to saber rattle latter on and garner more aid.

2006-06-22 04:27:16 · answer #3 · answered by claymore 3 · 0 0

You got it !

2006-06-22 03:46:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

RICH FOR

2006-06-22 03:47:09 · answer #5 · answered by UNIBOY 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers