Weapons of Mass Destruction?

Question

We have found 500 units of WMD since the war began. The liberals are now saying that those WMD's are not what we were looking for when we went to war, and that Bush still lied. (bush didn't send us to war, the United States Congress did) will the liberals ever face the truth and stop the double talking, stop the rambling off on topics nothing to do with the one in question, think logically, and see the war the way it really is?

Regarding one of the comments posted below, I want to say that 1) the anti-idiot-antidote is quite funny, and 2) I ABSOLUTELY believe the liberals are Communists and Socialists in disguise. I once knew a man, who honest to GOD (i'm not much of a believer, I just wanna annoy the liberals) lol, he honestly was a REGISTERED republican, based on Abe Lincoln's politics, and yet, he, a writer, could not get any of his books published in his younger years, as people thought he was a communist! AND he would watch CNN 24 freaking 7!!! omgsh it drove me nuts. Go FOX NEWS!!!

ADDITION>>>
I just want to reply to some of the posts. Someone said that fox news was in Bush's pocket, that they're completely slanted. I wonder if they've ever heard of CNN, CBS, ABC, and NBC? Someone also said that Bush is to be blamed for putting aside Bin Laden. If you recall, Under the CLINTON administration WE HAD Bin Laden, CLINTON LET HIM GO. also, I am not for big government, I actually don't really like the government, be it a communist 4 years or a republican 4 years. All politicians lie. The thing about politics is deciding who you like lying to you more. Now, regarding the soldiers. None of them are war mongerors, I am certainly not a war mongeror, but I am in full support of this war. Now I think we just need to get the Iraqi's on their feet.

Answer 1

No, they never will.

Liberals are too busy viewing the world they way they think it SHOULD work instead of observing how the world does work.

They argue and create policy trying to create a socialist gov't.

You can't convince a liberal their argument doesn't make sense. In 10 years or so they will find out Liberalism is a medical condition treatable with anti-idiot medication.

Answer 2

I think you misunderstand what we found. What the U.S. military found in Iraq were not weapons, but what is needed to make chemical weapons (which is NOT what we were looking for; we were looking for nuclear weapons). However, these materials had not been used. Now: if you do not know about the U.S. governmental system, I will inform you that the President of the United States can send troops overseas without the approval of Congress (Bush did do this). However, Congress must approve extensions to the amount of time that we can keep them there (the president can't keep them there for very long without Congress). However, if you did not know, Congress (both houses) had a Republican majority. This means that just about no matter what the Republican president WILL WIN. However, this may have not been the case if there was not an intelligence failure cover-up. If you did not know, we never found any evidence suggesting that Iraq: 1. Was involved with 9/11 (one of Bush's big things was that Saddam was part of it: NOT TRUE) 2. That Iraq had any nuclear weapons. However, Congress was told that both of these were true. Therefore, even if many Republicans would have voted against the war, they did not because they were tricked. Now, however, we cannot do anything, due to the fact that the Republicans still control Congress (meaning, there is no way to do anything to George W. Bush). One thing: what do you expect people to see the war as? A massacre of thousands of people? Forcing a government on a country? (doesn't sound like a democracy to me.....then again, I am one of those people who think that democracy has SOMETHING to do with the common people choosing...forced government...democracy.....bit of an oxy-moron, eh?) OH! I have it! Placing the person we knew was behind 9/11 aside (yes, our dear President once said, of Osama bin Laden, "He isn't a priority" Please realize that this was AFTER 9/11...but he is working hard to end terrorism in the world.....he is just taking an 8 year vacation from thinking...) so that we can invade a country that had nothing to do with the worst national disaster of the millenium (so far)? DID I GET IT?!

Oh, one more thing: "MB", EVERYONE KNOWS THAT FOX NEWS IS IN BUSH'S POCKET! ANYONE WHO DOUBTED IT COULD TELL FROM THE FACT THAT THEY ARE ALWAYS ON THE REPUBLICANS' SIDE! Oh, except for the like 24 words Colmes gets to say on HANNITY AND colmes. OH, YOU COULD ALSO TELL BY THE CONVIENIENT NEW PRESS SECRETARY....FOX NEWS....A FAIR AND BALANCED LOOK AT WHAT THE WHITE HOUSE WANTS YOU TO HEAR...

Answer 3

Liberals aren't saying THOSE WMD's aren't what we were looking for. when we went to war!!

The White House is saying that !

And just so you are clear, my source is Fox News, which can be checked at www.foxnews.com by you or anyone else. Here is from the Fox News Website:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Offering the OFFICIAL ADMINISTRATION response to FOX News, a SENIOR Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.

"This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the OFFICIAL said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, AND ARE NOT THE WMDs FOR WHICH THIS COUNTRY WENT TO WAR."

If you don't like what Fox News, The Bush Administration, and The Department of Defense is putting out,
why are you blaming "liberals"?

Answer 4

500 units of WMD have not been found. Units of spent or expired (unusable) WMDs, plus units of weapons that could not be used for mass destruction (rocket propelled grenades with toxic agents, for example), totalling 500, have been found.

Those WMDs were not what was being looked for. Bush, being the governmental public figure, and representative of the US congress, did lie.

These facts are nothing to cry about though. Saddam Hussein was just as much a tyrant as the next person in power, such as the people pulling the military strings of the US government, only he doubled as a public figure, so everyone knew he was a tyrant. He failed at covering himself with public relations armour, the way Bush is used, and was executed for it. Justice for crimes against humanity (and the rest) was a small bonus and a good coverup excuse. Thats the way international politics operates. maybe you could use some skills at reading between the lines when you watch the propagandist US news programs like those revealed in the expose documentary OutFoxed. Just a suggestion ...

Answer 5

The factors not being brought out are;
Democrats, including Mrs Clinton added fuel to the fire when they voted to go to war by something the British said. They really were going crazy over the issue. But, when election time came around, the Democrats changed their words. This is why Bush won the election; he never changed anything he was saying.
Under international rules, the parts found were discounted because so many nations hate Americans.
In America, congress is the only one who can go to war. The congress is the only one that can spend money.
The rhetoric from liberals is like an old 45 speed record; it is dying with the times. Bush did what he believed was right; the others are trying to balance on a fence, trying to save their jobs.

Answer 6

If there really are WMDs in Iraq (I doubt this, where did you get the information) they couldn't possibly have been put there by the US to justify an illegal war could they. (irony here)

I just saw the report used as a basis for these claims. They were on the fox network (now there's a relaible source) and provided by a couple of republican senators (also a relaigle source).

A defence spokesman said "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war."

The report also stated that they were very old and inoperable so they were not wmds at all

Answer 7

The only way Liberals are going to own up to even the faintest possibility that there were WMDs in Iraq before the war is for the "insurgents" to set off one of those IEDs made with a VX nerve gas shell. If the WMDs were not, and are not, there, why are the bad guys trying so hard to get their hands on some.

Answer 8

"a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions. 'This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war.'"

It's a good thing we've spend billions of dollars/month for the last three years in order to round up a few hundred expired mustard gas containers in Iraq. Meanwhile, as we are now hoplessly overextended in what amounts ot an Iraqi civil war, Iran is building a nuclear weapons program.

This so-called neo-consertative foreign policy is completely illogical, counter-productive and just plain immoral.

Answer 9

Well, this is the third mention of these so-called found WMD's I have seen today, and you're the third person to leave out the same minor details the other neocons neglected to mention:

First of all, what was found were the remains of a weapons program that was active pre-first Gulf War. If you care to browse the UN's WMD report you'll see that several remnants of this program have been found.

Secondly, and this is kind of a big one ... The agents in Chemical or Biological weapons, such as Saran or Agent Orange, have a maximum shelf life of (drum roll please) TWO WEEKS.

Not 15 years.

TWO WEEKS.

So who's really kidding who here?

Answer 10

hpgallard apparently missed the part that WE JUST FOUND over 500 WMDs.

Max,
I'm right there with you. I have no idea why liberals can't just acknowledge a good thing.

On getting Zarqawi:
- many liberals slide the focus back on Bin Laden in their response, there wasn't even a glimmer of satisfaction on their face when debating the news

On news of two U.S. troops being brutally murdered:
- liberals won't discuss it unless put on the spot, and are quick to divert attention to Haditha or Gitmo

Regarding the WMDs find:
- Nope, no chance they'll see this as good news either


It never stops....

Answer 11

Was colin powell talking about 5oo units.He did mention anthrax and several tons of it Oh and there was talk of a mushroom cloud, all the whitehouse lackeys used it Whats about mobile chemical laboritories Any of these among your 500 units Grow up if you still believe this fairy tale, The liars and war mongers may continue Meanwhile these are real soldiers being sacrificed to perpetuate this lie.Not to mention that a lot of people are making big bucks in iraq. They're the ones calling for patriotism and sacrifice.It is honorable for a soldier to die for his country,What is dishonorable is the perpetrators of this lie to get richer and richer and richer