Why or why not?
2006-06-21 19:42:40 · 7 answers · asked by imrational 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Corporations are already considered to be legal persons, partially to shield officers and employees from law suits.
The extent that a corporation should have the rights and freedoms of individuals is a matter of concern. Should a corporation be able to cast a ballot in an election? What if Microsoft or General Motors tried to run for president? Should Mary Kay Inc. be allowed to marry Calvin Klein, Inc? Government does not heavily regulate personal relationships, but it does regulate corporate mergers in an effort to ensure that the best interest of the nation and the consumer is served (at least, that is the theory).
2006-06-21 19:53:19 · answer #1 · answered by Raymond C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely, corporation comprises of living individuals and not robots,
we are human being and not animal in the jungle,
people live in groups with cooperation and support and interactions (which help them solve out issues and questions with out getting in to conflict as the animals do)
society is a place where people live and let live.
corporation is a place where people work in discipline and rules made by the company for the welfare of the company(group of people) ,the employees,the society.
so corporate rules are some thing additional for the individual that he has to follow when he has to get the company in to profits.
2006-06-21 20:29:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not especially. It's true that they are really groups of people, but the people already have the rights. So if corporations had the same rights, it would be like double-rights. Kind of like double-taxation.
2006-06-21 20:28:25 · answer #3 · answered by A B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it rather is perverse. keep in mind - it rather is the perverted skill hungry politicians who make the the self-serving regulations to finance their obscenely high priced election technique. In that regard the U. S. is an dazzling united states. In Canada that variety of election investment is outlawed. right here a prosperous employer has as plenty say or clout as a unmarried person who makes $2000 a month with reference to election donation(s). i think of this is a $500 cut back according to entity this is tax deductible.
2016-12-13 17:59:18 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes because they are a group of individuals.
2006-06-21 19:47:38 · answer #5 · answered by joyell222 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Basic, yes.
Then comes a different story.
2006-06-22 10:40:18 · answer #6 · answered by fiestygirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.. it depend to the country laws
2006-06-21 19:49:12 · answer #7 · answered by mblast.hesome 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋