It's FICTION. FICTION!
2006-06-21 16:36:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I personally do not agree with the da vinci code movie but I am a very religious person it is very inacurate christ was never married and if you were to read the gospels of Matthew Mark Luke and John you would know this. Christ was the most pure person to ever ealk this earth he never once fell into sin of any kind and was truly mistreated while he was here on earth. If you are still confused there is a really good book out there called the divinity code it will explain everything you might want to know. I hope this was a help to you and may God grab hold of your soul.
2006-06-21 17:02:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by stone_butterfly04 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The movie is not trying to tell anyone anything, according to an interview with the author that I saw on TV the other day. It is an interesting, exciting, and thought-provoking book that has captured the attention of a great many people. The book is a work of fiction. Much like every other book of fiction; some of the details are based on reality, but the events, as a whole, are not. I read the book and the premise was intriguing, but never for a moment did I think anyone would take this book for more than it represented itself to be - fiction.
2006-06-21 16:43:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tom Hanks is too old for his role.
His costar is supposed to be a red head and not a brunnette.
The book got chopped down too much.
And NO. It is fiction.
Think about it. DaVinci uses the Last Supper to show that Mary Magdalene was there. Why would she be there? Isn't that the whole body and blood meal? Why if she was carrying his heir would he do such a ritual? Why not just say "Hey guys meet the Mrs. Congratulations are in order." Instead he goes out to a garden and waits for somebody to find him and take him to the San Hedrian. If his wife had been there, don't you think that would have ad an effect on what he did and in what order he did it? I don't know, but my last goodbye would not have been to my work buddies. Theory has it they were all related, but even then; wife versus family, who do you see last if you know she is expecting. And they looked the story up and found that it was planted by a French man trying to give himself a claim to the thrown of France and subsequently the Holy Seat. He had access to documents in which the list of the Priory of Sion was found. As for the Maravingians, they all died or were killed. i could go on but you could just as easily watch A&E and the History Channel. Everybody as looked this up for you.
The true mystery of the Last Supper is what was the last thing said?
Answer: "If you want to be in the picture get on this side of the table."
2006-06-21 17:08:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by LORD Z 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. I find it funny, how Da Vinci was born like...1,500 years after Jesus, and he can say something about Jesus, and people are like WHOA! He's right. But then when someone from today says something, people say, "NO WAY! You weren't there. How would you know?!" It doesn't make sense. Who is Da Vinci to say all this stuff? He's just another random guy in the crowd. I mean, I really don't believe Jesus was married anyways. That's just my opinion. Hope this makes sense to you. God bless...
Then people say that it's fiction, which I believe..but do you know how many people believe that stuff? I could name at least 10 people that I know.
2006-06-21 16:37:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jacqui 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Da Vinci Code is a work of fiction. That is a stone cold fact, my friend. When someone "believes" it they are complementng the imagination of the writer. Even the writer states that it is a work of fiction, just like his previous novel. It may invoke real places and other real items, just like most movies and TV shoews, but it is not reality or based in reality.
2006-06-21 16:41:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michael R 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's fiction but that doesn't mean it does not send some "thing" to the audience. Any form of communication simply means that it carries a message. But as responsible audiences, we need to be aware of the messages and only pick the messages that conform to our values. I think that the movie, which I have seen, has emphasized the importance of Women throughout the ages. And also, the feminine side of God was more revealing--sometimes people go around the thinking that God plays only the Father role, but it also plays the Mother role as well.
2006-06-21 20:51:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not. I am smarter than that. I know that most of it is fictional presented in a non-fiction style to persuade the reader/viewer to a certain mindset. I am too versed in biblical knowledge and other history to be fooled by so much twisted and misinformation. Research some of it and you will find out for yourself.
2006-06-21 16:38:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by the Goddess Angel 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
To me it's just a distraction from what true Christianity truly stands for. If anything it reaffirms my faith.
The movie was just pure popcorn entertainment nothing more.
There's even a line in the movie... Tom Hanks' character Robert Langdon states, "what really matters is what you believe".
2006-06-21 17:40:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by ViRg() 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The film is not trying to "tell us" anything. It is fiction, intended to be entertaining, just like "the Terminator" or any fictional action adventure movie.
2006-06-21 16:37:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by enginerd 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only facts of the movie is what the priory and opus dei do and perform s their holy rituals. nobody except the priory know if the secret they're protecting is that mary magdalin was the mother of jesus' child. [the whole basis is a sack of crap]
2006-06-21 17:47:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by Arod (a girl) 2
·
0⤊
0⤋