English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

I think I do....Just remember that she is only refering to the three or four widows that are the most vocal and outspoken.

I have seen them being interviewed on television and have heard speeches that they have made. Its gotten to the point that I can almost recite the speeches with them...word for word.

They have been overexposed so much that, Yes, I think they are now past the grief stage and well into the "investment" stage.

The thing that I find the most curious is, that, these are the women who have made the most money on their husbands deaths.

2006-06-21 16:37:46 · answer #1 · answered by werk2much2000 4 · 1 0

Ann Coulter made those statements to sell books and get on TV. So who is really exploiting who here.

How was an Coulter hurt by 9/11? She's been making money off of it hand over fist.

2006-06-21 23:38:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Most Conservatives, on this site certainly, agree with Ann Coulter's ideas. I am not a Conservative, so I do not. A sample of her heartfelt, truthful book: (so very sarcastically said)
In "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," the uncompromisingly right-wing Coulter writes the Jersey Girls have no right to criticize President Bush or any of the failures that led to the terror attacks.
"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis," Coulter writes.
"And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy. . .
"These self-obsessed women seemed genuinely unaware that 9/11 was an attack on our nation and acted as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them."

This is an outright attack. Pose for Playboy? C'mon! Even Bill O'Reily was surprised.

2006-06-21 23:36:46 · answer #3 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0 0

Ann Coulter is just giving her opinion...just as Senator Kennedy did when he called Bush a Nazi, and saying the "prisions and rape rooms in Iraq were now open under new managment(i.e. America)." I find it funny that a woman who is strong in her beliefs is demonized, while other women, namely the Jersey Girls, are held in high regard even when they are using thier husbands(and son) deaths for a political cause; namely the President of the United States.
If my husband, who is in the military, was killed...I would be mad at those who MURDERED him...not those that sent him over- seas or his boss that expected him to come into work.
I am a Conservative Federalist and yes, I listen to Rush Limbaugh...does that make me an idiot to believe in my political views...or does it make me informed of another opinion on politics? And while I am a Conservative, I am out-raged that here in Kansas there is a Baptist Church that goes around saying that soldiers die because this country gives safe harbour to gays. That is not Conservativism...just like some other things I see here on this Yahoo Answers thing...
People are free to think what they wish, and have Freedom of Speech...why are some allowed to have it, and others are not. So in closing...Ann Coulter is free to think and say what she wishes...just as everyone else is. It's one thing to disagree with her, but to lose all civility and say she should die, or say she should be shut up, or say that she has no right to say what she's saying...come on. If you have the "right" to say that here on the internet...she has the "right" to write her book.

2006-06-22 01:46:47 · answer #4 · answered by Poppet 3 · 0 0

Ann Coulter is a mentallly impaired person of questionable quality who needs to be put away for the safety of society at large.

By the way, WHEN YOUR HUSBANDS ARE KILLED IN A POLITICAL MANNER (the Terrorists were making a political statement) then you definately have the rights to use the deaths of your most dearly loved ones as platforms to better society. Whenever the Mother of a missing child starts a Missing Child organization, no one accuses her of grandstanding on her daughters disappearance, when a Mother lost her child to a drunk driver and started MADD, no one accused her of only wanting her name in the paper (can you even name her?). No, because she did it to stop senseless deaths, not get famous.

2006-06-21 23:36:27 · answer #5 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 0 0

Her idea on the 3 Jersey Widows?
I think that the Jersey widows are very much enjoying their status and are using it politically. Once they stepped over the line and went political with it, they became fair game to all other political pundits.
I personally think that they are being used by the democrat's against the president. Who is abusing who?

2006-06-21 23:35:57 · answer #6 · answered by lancelot682005 5 · 0 0

She would be such an attractive person if she wasn't such an angry, hateful creature. Do you ever wonder what happened in her life to make her so cold and self-righteous? I not only don't agree with her attitude toward the widows and mothers, I wonder if she ever had a mother.

2006-06-21 23:54:56 · answer #7 · answered by chi chi 4 · 0 0

Ann Coulter is a mentally disturbed woman.

2006-06-21 23:34:40 · answer #8 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0 0

I do. It's sad how democrats use people like those widows and sheehan to promote their platform. I remember when funerals used to be about honoring the people that have passed but don't tell that to the democrats to them it's a chance to promote thier platform.

2006-06-22 00:28:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What do you do when you confront a pit-bull foaming at the mouth? Pet it? Try to understand it? Put it out of its misery? I pick door no. 3.

2006-06-21 23:48:37 · answer #10 · answered by Ambers'Dad 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers